Klearchos and Klearchos and Ors (No 2)
[2016] FamCA 984
•10 November 2016
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| KLEARCHOS & KLEARCHOS AND ORS (NO 2) | [2016] FamCA 984 |
| FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for relief in relation to requests for answers to specific questions – Application granted – Time to file evidence in chief extended |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Klearchos |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Klearchos |
| SECOND RESPONDENT: | E Pty Limited |
| THIRD RESPONDENT: | Q Pty Limited |
| FOURTH RESPONDENT: | R Pty Limited |
| FIFTH RESPONDENT: | H Limited |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 2977 | of | 2013 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 10 November 2016 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Loughnan J |
| HEARING DATE: | 10 November 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Cummings SC with Mr Sweeney |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Lander & Rogers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Lloyd SC |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Barkus Doolan |
| COUNSEL FOR THE SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS: | Mr Wheelhouse SC |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS: | Rockwell Olivier |
| COUNSEL FOR THE FIFTH RESPONDENT: | Mr O’Brien |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE FIFTH RESPONDENT: | Peters Linette Lawyers |
Orders
An order be made in terms of paragraph 2 contained in the Response to an Application in a Case filed on behalf of the Fifth Respondent on 9 November 2016, as set out hereunder:
2. That questions numbered 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 26 and 27 in the specific questions directed to H Ltd by the wife pursuant to orders dated 24 May 2016 be set aside.
The time in which the parties are to file the evidence in chief, which is Order 11 of 24 May 2016, is extended to the close of business on 16 November 2016.
The time by which the husband and the second, third, fourth and fifth respondents are to respond to a Request For Answers To Specific Questions administered by letter on 7 October 2016 is extended to 4.00 pm on 14 November 2016 and note that in relation to each request those parties are to provide such answers as they are able by that date and time.
Not later than 4.00 pm on 18 November 2016 the wife provide to the solicitors for the husband answers to the questions posed in a letter from the solicitors for the husband to the solicitors for the wife dated 7 May 2015 save in relation to paragraph 3.
Not later than 4.00 pm on 18 November 2016 each of the parties provide to all the solicitors for all of the other parties a list of the documents proposed to be tendered in each parties’ case. In addition, the wife shall identify in her list, any document required by paragraph 2 of the letter dated 7 May 2015.
By 10.00 am on 28 November 2016 the advocates for the parties settle a draft trial plan addressing the management of the trial and the plan is to contemplate the completion of all evidence and oral submissions by 4.00 pm on the last day of the trial.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Klearchos & Klearchos and Ors (No 2) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
FILE NUMBER: SYC2977 of 2013
| Mr Klearchos |
Applicant
And
| Ms Klearchos |
Respondent
And
| E Pty Limited |
Second Respondent
And
| Q Pty Limited |
Third Respondent
And
| R Pty Limited |
Fourth Respondent
And
| H Limited |
Fifth Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These are proceedings that have been fixed for hearing over 10 days starting on 28 November 2016. The husband has filed an application for relief in relation to requests for answers to specific questions. There have been some discussions today about what changes could be made into the trial directions made on 24 May 2016. As a result I will extend the time within which the parties are to file the evidence-in-chief, which is order 11 of 24 May 2016, to the close of business on 16 November 2016.
The time by which the husband and the second, third and fourth respondents and the fifth respondent are to respond to a request for answers to specific questions - administered by letter on 7 October 2016 - to 4.00 pm on 14 November 2016. In each case those parties are to provide such answers as they are able by that date and time.
By not later than 4.00 pm on 18 November 2016 each of the parties is to provide to the solicitors for all other parties – a list of the documents proposed to be tendered in those parties’ cases. The advocates are to settle a draft trial plan.
I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of the Honourable Justice Loughnan delivered on 10 November 2016.
Associate:
Date: 18 November 2016
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Costs
0
0
0