| [2015] FWCA 5599 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
KJ Industrial Scaffolding Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4550)
K.J. INDUSTRIAL SCAFFOLDING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 14 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the KJ Industrial Scaffolding Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the K.J. Industrial Scaffolding Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by K.J. Industrial Scaffolding Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Australian Workers Union Port Kembla South Coast & Southern Highlands Branch being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 14 August 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 August 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415261 PR570823>
- AGLC
- KJ Industrial Scaffolding Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5599
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5599
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement contained all the mandatory terms prescribed by the Act, whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable way of determining employees' terms and conditions of employment, and whether the agreement had been genuinely agreed to by the parties. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for a safety net of minimum terms and conditions of employment and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.
The Commission found that the agreement contained all the mandatory terms prescribed by the Act, and that it provided for a fair and reasonable way of determining employees' terms and conditions of employment. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been genuinely agreed to by the parties and that it provided for a safety net of minimum terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission approved the agreement and made an order accordingly.
The Commission's order approved the Enterprise Agreement 2015 as a registered agreement under section 179 of the Act. The order also provided that the agreement would be taken to have effect from the date of the Commission's decision. The order was binding on all parties to the agreement, including the applicant and the employees covered by the agreement. The order was also binding on any future employees who were employed by the applicant and who were covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.