Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2006] AATA 1509
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No N2006/74
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION ) Re SHANNON KITCHENER Applicant
And
AUSTRALIA POSTAL CORPORATION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Ms R Hunt, Senior Member
Dr M Thorpe, MemberDate21 December 2006
PlaceSydney
Decision The decision under review is affirmed.
……………………………….
Robin Hunt
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS – WORKERS COMPENSATION – injury and impairment – liability of comcare to pay compensation in respect of injury to neck and lower back – intermittent condition – worker sustained no injury causing intermittent consequential injury to the head as intermittent headaches – finding intermittent headaches do not cause interference with activities of daily living under table 13.1 so as to cause a permanent impairment.
LEGISLATION
safety rehabilitation and compensation act 1988 (cth) ss 4, 24, 27, 28 & 124
AUTHORITIES
canute v comcare [2006] HCA 47
o’rourke v comcare [1999] No 12154 (unreported)
comcare v emery [1993] 32 ALD 147
allen v comcare [2000] AATA 152
daniel v department of defence [1988] AAT No 13246, 730
REASONS FOR DECISION
21 December 2006 Ms R Hunt, Senior Member
Dr M Thorpe, MemberSUMMARY
1. Mr Kitchener, the applicant, sought compensation for permanent impairment caused at work. We have considered his claims and are not satisfied, on balance, that he has any compensable permanent impairment resulting from any workplace injury. This means his claim has failed. Our reasons appear below.
BACKGROUND
2. This is an application for review concerning a decision of Australia Post dated 28 December 2005 affirming a determination of 30 November 2005 that Australia Post is not liable under ss 24 and 27 of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (the Act) to pay Mr Kitchener compensation for permanent impairment in relation to his lumbar/thoracic strain injury.
3. Australia Post by determination, dated 17 May 2002, accepted liability for mild sprain to thoracic and lumbar spine with a date of injury 14 March 2002. By a further determination, dated 15 September 2003, Australia Post accepted liability for cervical facet joint irritation with a date of injury 17 June 2003.
ISSUES
4. The issues before the Tribunal are:
a) whether Mr Kitchener has suffered any permanent impairment to his neck, pursuant to table 9.6 of the Comcare Guide;
b) whether Mr Kitchener has suffered any permanent impairment of his lower back pursuant to table 9.6 of the Comcare Guide as a result of the incidents on 14 March 2002 and 17 June 2003;
c) whether Mr Kitchener suffers from migraine consequent to the incidents and, if so, any permanent impairment pursuant to table 13.1 of the Act; and
d) whether Mr Kitchener is entitled to a lump sum payment for permanent impairment of his neck and lower back pursuant to ss 24 and 27 of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988.
MR KITCHENER’S HISTORY:
5. Australia Post records before us show that Mr Kitchener commenced employment with Australia Post on 19 July 1996 as a Postal…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kitchener and Australia Postal Corporation and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2006] AATA 1509
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine the nature and extent of Kitchener's injuries and whether they resulted in a permanent impairment. Specifically, the court had to decide if the intermittent headaches, which were a consequence of the initial injuries, constituted an impairment under the relevant workers' compensation table. The court also needed to consider the impact of these headaches on Kitchener's ability to perform daily activities.
The court examined the evidence and found that Kitchener's injuries to the neck and lower back were indeed compensable. However, the intermittent headaches did not cause significant interference with Kitchener's daily living activities as per the criteria in Table 13.1. Consequently, the court concluded that the headaches did not amount to a permanent impairment. The decision to affirm the earlier decision was based on this finding.
The court's decision affirmed the earlier determination that the Australia Postal Corporation, through Comcare, was not liable to pay compensation for the intermittent headaches experienced by Kitchener. The affirmation of the decision meant that the original finding that the headaches did not result in a permanent impairment remained in place.
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.