Kinkade v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

KINKADE

v

THE QUEEN

[2019] HCASL 361
D17/2019

  1. This application for special leave to appeal requires an extension of time. The decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory was plainly correct. An appeal would enjoy no prospects of success. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
13 November 2019
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kinkade v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 361
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Kinkade v The Queen was heard in the High Court of Australia. The applicant, Kinkade, sought special leave to appeal against his conviction and sentence. Kinkade was convicted of serious criminal offences and his appeal was dismissed by the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory. The legal issues that arose in this case were whether the Court of Criminal Appeal had erred in its findings and whether the appeal had any prospects of success.

The High Court considered the merits of the appeal and the arguments put forward by Kinkade. The Court found that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal was correct and that there were no errors of law or fact that would warrant a special leave to appeal. The Court also considered whether the appeal had any prospects of success and found that it did not. The Court held that it would be futile to grant an extension of time for the appeal and that the application should be dismissed.

In reaching its decision, the High Court applied the relevant legal principles and precedents. The Court found that the Court of Criminal Appeal had exercised its discretion correctly and that there were no grounds for interference. The Court also considered the principles of finality and the importance of maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system.

The High Court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal and ordered that the Registrar draw up, sign and seal an order to that effect. This decision reinforces the importance of the finality of criminal convictions and the limited circumstances in which special leave to appeal will be granted. The outcome of this case is significant for legal practitioners as it provides guidance on the criteria for granting special leave to appeal and the role of the High Court in reviewing decisions of lower courts.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.