Kings Warehouse Administration Pty Ltd

Case

[2021] FWCA 5922

1 OCTOBER 2021

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2021] FWCA 5922
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Kings Warehouse Administration Pty Ltd
(AG2021/7053)

KINGS WAREHOUSE ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Storage services

COMMISSIONER SIMPSON

BRISBANE, 1 OCTOBER 2021

Application for approval of the Kings Warehouse Administration Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Kings Warehouse Administration Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Kings Warehouse Administration Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] Noting the undertakings provided, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES in the Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] The Agreement does not contain a model flexibility term compliant with the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE513187  PR734176>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0