King v CGU-VACC Insurance Limited
[2008] NSWCA 236
•17 September 2008
NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CITATION:
King v CGU-VACC Insurance Limited [2008] NSWCA 236
FILE NUMBER(S):
40108/08
HEARING DATE(S):
17 September 2008
EX TEMPORE DATE:
17 September 2008
PARTIES:
Treavor King (Applicant)
CGU-VACC Insurance Limited (Respondent)
JUDGMENT OF:
Beazley JA McColl JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:
Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):
SC 15606/07
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Harrison AsJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION:
8 April 2008
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:
King v CGU-VACC
COUNSEL:
M Rogers (Applicant)
M Lee (Respondent)
SOLICITORS:
Fitzpatrick Solicitors (Applicant)
William Roberts Lawyers (Respondent)
CATCHWORDS:
Leave to appeal - circumstances of damage to vehicle clearly within exclusion provisions of insurance policy
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
TEXTS CITED:
DECISION:
The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
JUDGMENT:
- 1 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40108/08
BEAZLEY JA
McCOLL JAEx tempore 17 September 2008
Treavor King v CGU-VACC Insurance Limited
Judgment
THE COURT: The Court refuses leave in this matter.
The circumstances in which the vehicle was damaged were unambiguously covered by the exclusions. There is a question as to whether those exclusions operate when a vehicle is stolen, although, as indicated by Associate Justice Harrison, they would not. However, that is not the point in issue before us.
Further, the claim is a relatively small claim, although it is undoubtedly very important to the claimant. Nonetheless, the fact that it is a small claim is relevant to the exercise of the Court’s discretion.
The Court dismisses the summons for leave to appeal with costs.
**********
LAST UPDATED:
30 September 2008
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Contract Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Breach
-
Contract Formation
0
0