King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 4630


[2015] FWCA 4630
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3705)

KING TIDE SHEETMETAL PTY LTD AND AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2012

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 15 JULY 2015

Application for approval of the King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd and Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Collective Agreement 2012.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 29 June 2015 by King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd and Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Collective Agreement 2012(“the Agreement”).

[2] The parties have provided clarification to the Commission that it is the mutual understanding of the employer and the employee bargaining representative - the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (“the AMWU”), that clause 6 of the Agreement sets out the application of the Agreement and prevails not withstanding clause 10 of the Agreement.

[3] Sub clause 15.6 of the Agreement (“use of supplementary labour”) raises enforceability questions. This is because the clause imposes upon the employer an obligation not to utilise supplementary labour for a period of more than six weeks, without the consent of the AMWU.

[4] In this respect, I explained in a separate previous decision - [2013] FWC 5033 - that such a clause, as it purports to restrict or qualify the employer’s right to use contractors or utilise contracted labour, may not comprise permitted content for the purposes of s.172 of the Act and would be unenforceable as a result.

[5] The consultation clause does not conform with s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[7] The AMWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the AMWU.

[8] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE414703  PR569209>

Details
AGLC
King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4630
Case
[2015] FWCA 4630
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd applied for the approval of the King Tide Sheetmetal Pty Ltd and Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Collective Agreement 2012. The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for workers within the company. The company and the union submitted the agreement for approval, seeking to ensure that the agreement met the legal standards and requirements set forth by the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it met the requirements for a registered agreement and whether it contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The court also needed to determine if the agreement was fair and reasonable, and whether it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The union argued that the agreement was fair and reasonable, while the company supported its approval.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions, including provisions relating to wages, hours of work, and leave. The court determined that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties and was fair and reasonable. The agreement was approved, and the parties were directed to take all necessary steps to ensure its registration. The commission held that the agreement met the legal standards and requirements set forth by the Fair Work Act 2009, and was therefore approved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.