[2013] FWCA 887 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
King Bay Maritime Employment Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/4780)
KBMES - AIMPE (PORT OF BUNBURY) TOWAGE OPERATIONS UNION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2012
Port authorities | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 8 FEBRUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the KBMES - AIMPE (Port of Bunbury) Towage Operations Union Collective Agreement 2012.
[1] On 30 January 2013, King Bay Maritime Employment Services Pty Ltd made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the KBMES - AIMPE (Port of Bunbury) Towage Operations Union Collective Agreement 2012 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the FW Act”).
[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 7 January 2013.
[3] Having received an explanation from the Applicant, I am satisfied that, in the circumstances, it is fair to extend the period for filing the application to 30 January 2013.
[4] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.
[5] The Applicant has declared that in the absence of a consultation term in the Agreement, the model consultation term, as set out in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009, is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[7] The Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (AIMPE) has declared that the AIMPE was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and is entitled to represent the industrial interests of those employees in accordance with paragraph 176(1)(b) of the FW Act. Further, the AIMPE supports the approval of the Agreement by the Commission and has read and agrees with the Employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application, insofar as it is within the Institute’s knowledge. Finally, the AIMPE has given notice that, pursuant to s.183 of the FW Act, it wants to be covered by the Agreement.
[8] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 15 February 2013.
[9] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 30 September 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE899778 PR533907>
- AGLC
- King Bay Maritime Employment Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 887
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 887
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the union had followed proper procedures in negotiating the agreement, and whether the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable in all the circumstances. This included an examination of whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employees and whether it adhered to the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it appropriately balanced the rights and obligations of both the employer and the employees.
In its reasoning, the court found that the union had followed proper procedures in negotiating the agreement and that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The court held that the agreement provided adequate protections for employees and met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court noted that the agreement had been the subject of extensive negotiations between the parties and that it had been agreed to by both the employer and the union. The court also found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and appropriately balanced the rights and obligations of both the employer and the employees.
Consequently, the court approved the KBMES - AIMPE (Port of Bunbury) Towage Operations Union Collective Agreement 2012, confirming its compliance with the Fair Work Act. This decision sets a precedent for similar agreements in the maritime industry and underscores the importance of fair and reasonable negotiations in collective agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.