| [2015] FWCA 4424 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Kimberley Pipelines Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3689)
KIMBERLEY PIPELINES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 2 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Kimberley Pipelines Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Kimberley Pipelines Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Kimberley Pipelines Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 2 July 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE414568 PR568938>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Kimberley Pipelines Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4424
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4424
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the process by which the agreement was made, including the participation of the union and the employer in negotiations. It considered whether the agreement provided for adequate consultation and whether the process allowed for genuine bargaining. The Commission also assessed whether the agreement met the requirements for a "simple" agreement, which would exempt it from certain procedural requirements. In reaching its decision, the Commission took into account the nature of the industry, the bargaining power of the parties, and the specific terms of the agreement. Ultimately, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion, and that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The agreement was approved, providing a framework for the employment terms and conditions of the employees covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.