Kimberley-Clarke Worldwide, Inc v Alexandra Goulimis
Case
•
[2008] ATMO 8
•17 January 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kimberley-Clarke Worldwide, Inc v Alexandra Goulimis [2008] ATMO 8
[2008] ATMO 8
17 January 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by Kimberly-Clarke Worldwide, Inc. (the opponent) to the registration of a trade mark by Alexandra Goulimis (the applicant). The opponent relied on several grounds under the Act, including sections 42, 43, 44, and 60. The hearing officer noted that the opponent had not established the grounds relied upon.
The legal issues before the court were whether the grounds of opposition raised by Kimberly-Clarke under sections 42, 43, 44, and 60 of the Act had been established. The opponent asserted its ownership of the "HUGGIES" trade mark and provided evidence of its extensive use in Australia since 1987 in relation to a wide range of baby care products, including nappies, wipes, and creams. Evidence was presented regarding the significant market leadership and high brand awareness of the "HUGGIES" trade mark in Australia.
The hearing officer found that the opponent had been unsuccessful in establishing any of the grounds of opposition. Consequently, the hearing officer directed that the trade mark application could proceed to registration, subject to the resolution of another pending opposition in favour of the applicant. Furthermore, if an appeal against this decision or the other opposition decision was filed, registration was to be stayed until the appeal was determined. The hearing officer also ordered that the opponent pay the applicant's costs.
The legal issues before the court were whether the grounds of opposition raised by Kimberly-Clarke under sections 42, 43, 44, and 60 of the Act had been established. The opponent asserted its ownership of the "HUGGIES" trade mark and provided evidence of its extensive use in Australia since 1987 in relation to a wide range of baby care products, including nappies, wipes, and creams. Evidence was presented regarding the significant market leadership and high brand awareness of the "HUGGIES" trade mark in Australia.
The hearing officer found that the opponent had been unsuccessful in establishing any of the grounds of opposition. Consequently, the hearing officer directed that the trade mark application could proceed to registration, subject to the resolution of another pending opposition in favour of the applicant. Furthermore, if an appeal against this decision or the other opposition decision was filed, registration was to be stayed until the appeal was determined. The hearing officer also ordered that the opponent pay the applicant's costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
The Coffee Club Pty. Limited v Caffco Industries Pty. Limited [2011] ATMO 101
Cases Citing This Decision
1
The Coffee Club Pty. Limited v Caffco Industries Pty. Limited
[2011] ATMO 101
Cases Cited
20
Statutory Material Cited
0
PB Foods Ltd v Malanda Dairy Foods Ltd
[1999] FCA 1602
Advantage Rent-a-Car Inc v Advantage Car Rental Pty Ltd
[2001] FCA 683
Aston v Harlee Manufacturing Co
[1960] HCA 47