FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kimber v The Owners Strata Plan 48216 (No 2) [2017] FCA 750
Appeal from: Kimber v The Owners Strata Plan No. 48216 [2016] FCA 1090 File number: NSD 1689 of 2016 Judge: GLEESON J Date of judgment: 9 June 2017 Date of publication of reasons: 4 July 2017 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal – where draft notice substantially but not entirely in the form allowed by grant of leave to appeal – where there is no prejudice to the respondent by an extension of time – application granted with non-conforming portions of the draft notice of appeal excised
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – review of a decision of a Registrar to refuse to accept documents for filing – whether documents are an abuse of process – whether Court has power to make orders sought in the interlocutory application – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Federal Court Rules 2011
Date of hearing: 9 June 2017 Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 16 Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms S Meimanis of Grace Lawyers Pty Limited ORDERS
NSD 1689 of 2016 BETWEEN: JANELLE MARY KIMBER
Appellant
AND: THE OWNERS STRATA PLAN NO 48216 (AGENTS/OFFICERS)
Respondent
JUDGE:
GLEESON J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 JUNE 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Time is extended to 9 June 2017 to file the Notice of Appeal dated 26 April 2017, amended to delete the first five lines on page three.
2.The Notice of Appeal dated 26 April 2017 with the excisions set out in Order 1 shall be taken to be filed on 9 June 2017 and shall stand as the Notice of Appeal in the appeal.
3.The application to review the decision of Deputy District Registrar Cho made on 7 June 2017 is dismissed.
4.Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the extension of time application.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
GLEESON J:
EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL
On 9 June 2017, I extended the time for filing of the notice of appeal dated 26 April 2016, on terms that some words in the notice of appeal be excised. The excision was required to remove words that sought relief beyond the scope of the grant of leave to appeal in Kimber v The Owners Strata Plan No. 48216 [2017] FCA 364.
At the hearing on the application, the respondent opposed the grant of an extension of time on two bases. The first was that the grant of an extension of time would prejudice the respondent’s interests in having a creditor’s petition against Ms Kimber heard before April 2018, when the petition will expire. Second, the respondent submitted that the proposed appeal…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kimber v The Owners Strata Plan 48216 (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] FCA 750
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the application for an extension of time should be granted as there was no prejudice to the respondent by the short delay involved, and Kimber, being self-represented, evidently experienced difficulty in understanding and complying with the court’s processes. The court excised the non-conforming portions of the draft notice of appeal and ordered that the amended notice be filed by the specified date. The court also dismissed the application for review of the Registrar’s decision, finding that the documents were not an abuse of process and that the court lacked the power to make the orders sought in the interlocutory application.
The court's orders included granting an extension of time for filing the notice of appeal with specified excisions, dismissing the application for review of the Registrar’s decision, and ordering that each party bear its own costs in relation to the extension of time application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Time is extended to 9 June 2017 to file the Notice of Appeal dated 26 April 2017, amended to delete the first five lines on page three.
2. The Notice of Appeal dated 26 April 2017 with the excisions set out in Order 1 shall be taken to be filed on 9 June 2017 and shall stand as the Notice of Appeal in the appeal.
3. The application to review the decision of Deputy District Registrar Cho made on 7 June 2017 is dismissed.
4. Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the extension of time application.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.