Kim v Minister for Home Affairs
[2018] FCCA 1964
•20 June 2018
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| KIM & ORS v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR | [2018] FCCA 1964 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – No appearance by the applicant – whether an appropriate matter for Court to exercise powers under r 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 – application dismissed under r 13.03C(1)(c). |
| Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), r.13.03C(1)(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s. 476 |
| First Applicant: | HYUNG WAN KIM |
| Second Applicant: | HYUN KYUNG KIM |
| Third Applicant: | JIYONG KIM |
| Fourth Applicant: | JIHWAN KIM |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 540 of 2018 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 20 June 2018 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 20 June 2018 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 20 June 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
No appearance by or on behalf of the applicants.
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Mr D Baddeley Mills Oakley |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed under r 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The first and second applicants pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the amount of $3,667.00.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 540 of 2018
| HYUNG WAN KIM |
First Applicant
| HYUN KYUNG KIM |
Second Applicant
| JIYONG KIM |
Third Applicant
| JIHWAN KIM |
Fourth Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the Migration Act”) in respect of a decision of the Administrative Appeal Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) made on 25 January 2018 holding that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction in relation to an application to review a refusal made on 8 December 2017 to grant the applicant Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) (Subclass 457) visa.
These proceedings commenced on 1 March 2018. On 22 March 2018, a Registrar of the Court made orders fixing the matter for hearing today. On the Court file, it is apparent that there was a notice of intention to withdraw of lawyer filed on 19 April 2018 and a notice of withdrawal of lawyer was filed on 3 May 2018 and again on 17 May 2018.
The matter has been called and the applicants have failed to appear. The first respondent has moved for the proceedings to be dismissed under r 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Rules 2001. The Court has endeavoured to contact the first applicant on the telephone number identified on the intention to withdraw as lawyer without success. It is now past 9:45am and the first applicant has not appeared in the Court. The Court is satisfied that the applicants were aware of the hearing date and that this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed under r 13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
I certify that the preceding I certify that the preceding four (4) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Date: 21 September 2018
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
-
Appeal
0
0
3