KILKENNY
v
KILKENNY & ORS
[2019] HCASL 67
P66/2018
The applicant requires a short extension of time to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The application does not raise a question of legal principle that is suitable for the grant of special leave. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought. Special leave to appeal should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M. Bell
20 March 2019S.J. Gageler
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kilkenny v Kilkenny and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 67
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court considered the nature of the applicant's request and assessed whether the extension of time sought would lead to a meaningful outcome. The court examined whether the proposed appeal had the potential to address a significant legal issue. In this case, the court determined that the application did not raise a question of legal principle that warranted special leave. Therefore, the court concluded that granting the extension of time would be futile. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was refused.
The reasoning of the High Court was that the application did not meet the threshold for a meaningful appeal, as it did not present a suitable legal question. The court directed the Registrar to prepare an order dismissing the application for special leave to appeal. This decision was based on the premise that any extension of time would not result in a successful appeal due to the lack of a significant legal issue. The final order dismissed the application and indicated that the appeal would not proceed further.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.