Kigen (Migration)

Case

[2018] AATA 5840

12 December 2018


Kigen (Migration) [2018] AATA 5840 (12 December 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Mr Alexander Kigen

CASE NUMBER:  1822664

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2018/1399601

MEMBER:Mark Bishop

DATE:12 December 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

·cl.500.217 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 12 December 2018 at 3:57pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – medical health assessment – health requirement met – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.217, Schedule 4, PIC 4005

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 17 July 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicant applied for the visa on 26 March 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.

  3. The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.217of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because of failure to provide proof of medical assessment.

  4. The Tribunal determined the review application on the papers.

  5. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  6. The issue in this review is whether the visa applicant meets Public Interest Criterion (PIC) 4005 as required by the criteria for the grant of the visa. Public Interest Criterion 4005, as it applies to this case, is extracted in the attachment to this decision. It requires the applicant, in certain circumstances, to undergo medical assessment, and to be free of certain diseases or conditions that may impact on the community

    Has the applicant undertaken a medical assessment (PIC 4005(1)(aa))?

  7. Public Interest Criterion 4005(1)(aa) requires that if the applicant is in a specified class of persons, he or she must undertake the specified medical assessment and be assessed by a specified person unless a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth (MOC) decides otherwise. The relevant class of persons and assessments are specified in the relevant IMMI Instrument.

  8. On 28 September 2018 the applicant provided confirmation of appointment time for medical health assessment.

  9. The applicant’s ICSE record (Tf: 34) confirmed the applicant met the finalised health requirement on 5 November 2018.

  10. For these reasons the requirements in PIC 4005(1)(aa) are met.

    CONCLUDING PARAGRAPHS

  11. Given the findings above, the appropriate course is for the Tribunal to remit the matter to the Minister for reconsideration of the remaining criteria for the visa.

    DECISION

  12. The Tribunal remits the application for Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa:

    ·PIC 4005(1)(aa) for the purposes of cl.500.217 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations;

    Mark Bishop
    Member


Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Remedies

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0