Kidd (Migration)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 3349
•1 August 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kidd (Migration) [2018] AATA 3349
[2018] AATA 3349
1 August 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Kidd, sought judicial review of a decision concerning a Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) visa, Subclass 457 (Temporary Work (Skilled)). The respondent was not explicitly named but the matter was before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration Division).
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to hear the applicant's appeal. This question arose because the applicant had lodged their application for review prior to a decision being formally made.
The Tribunal, constituted by Member Warren Stooke AM, reasoned that for it to have jurisdiction, a reviewable decision must have been made at the time the application for review was lodged. As no such decision had been made, the application was deemed not to have been properly made, and therefore the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether it possessed jurisdiction to hear the applicant's appeal. This question arose because the applicant had lodged their application for review prior to a decision being formally made.
The Tribunal, constituted by Member Warren Stooke AM, reasoned that for it to have jurisdiction, a reviewable decision must have been made at the time the application for review was lodged. As no such decision had been made, the application was deemed not to have been properly made, and therefore the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction.
Consequently, the Tribunal ordered that it did not have jurisdiction in the matter.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Kidd (Migration) [2018] AATA 3349
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Ahmad v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2015] FCAFC 182
Dyankov v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2017] FCAFC 81