Khoury v Holroyd City Council

Link copied
Case Copied 23 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Khoury v Holroyd City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1236
Hearing dates:21 November 2013
Decision date: 11 December 2013
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Fakes C
Decision:

1. Mr Robert Khoury, owner of premises on Lot 24 DP 26984 known as 36 Frances Street, South Wentworthville, NSW is to cease the use of those premises as an unauthorised boarding house within 60 days of the service of a sealed copy of this order on the applicant.

2. The exhibits, except 1, are returned.

Catchwords: Section 121B Order; use of premises as an unauthorised boarding house; substantial non-compliance with aspects of the BCA; safety of residents
Legislation Cited: Boarding Houses Act 2012
Civil Procedure Act 2005
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991
Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 2013
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006
State Environmental Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009
Cases Cited: Holroyd City Council v Khoury (No 3) [2011] NSWLEC 210
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mr Robert Khoury (Applicant)
Holroyd City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Applicant: Mr R Khoury (Litigant in person)
Respondent: Mr M Wright (Barrister)
Solicitors
Respondent: Matthews Folbigg Pty Ltd
File Number(s):10472 of 2013

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal under s 121ZK of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) made by the applicant, Mr Khoury, in respect of a s 121B(1) Order (the order) issued by Holroyd City Council on 23 May 2013.

  1. Mr Khoury seeks orders for his appeal to be upheld and the order to be 'dismissed' or revoked.

  1. The order requires the applicant to cease the use of premises on Lot 24 DP26984, known as 36 Francis Street, South Wentworthville, NSW as an unauthorised boarding house by 22 July 2013.

  1. The reasons for the order, in accordance with s 121L of the Act, are:

(1) Inspection of the premises reveals that the premises are being used as an unauthorised boarding house with 10 sole occupancy units having been constructed within the external envelope of the building. The current use of the building is as a Class 3(a) building as defined in Part A3.2 Volume One of the 2013 Building Code of Australia.
The approved classification of the building is as two Class 1(a) attached dual occupancy dwellings as defined in Part A3.2 Volume One of the 2013 Building Code of Australia [BCA].
(2) At the time of original inspection on 24 April 2013, 10 persons variously occupying 5 sole occupancy units were spoken to. All persons spoken to indicated that they were renting a room and nominated you, Robert Khoury, as their landlord.
At the time of the subsequent inspection on 23 may 2013, 4 persons variously occupying 4 sole occupancy units were spoken to. All persons spoken to indicated that they were renting a room and nominated you, Robert Khoury, as their landlord.
(3) A search of Council records indicates development consent for use of the premises as a…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Khoury v Holroyd City Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2013] NSWLEC 1236
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter between Mr Robert Khoury and Holroyd City Council was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. Mr Khoury, the owner of a property located at 36 Frances Street, South Wentworthville, was accused of operating the premises as an unauthorised boarding house. Holroyd City Council sought an order to cease the use of the premises for such a purpose and to return certain exhibits. The central issue before the court was whether the property in question was being used as an unauthorised boarding house and if Mr Khoury was required to cease such operations. The court examined the evidence presented and considered the definitions and criteria for categorising a property as a boarding house under relevant legislation. The court found that the property did indeed meet the criteria for an unauthorised boarding house due to the number of occupants, their lack of exclusive use of facilities, and the overall living arrangements. As such, the court ordered Mr Khoury to cease the unauthorised boarding house operations within 60 days of the order being served. Additionally, all exhibits were to be returned except for one, which the court deemed necessary to retain.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Mr Robert Khoury, owner of premises on Lot 24 DP 26984 known as 36 Frances Street, South Wentworthville, NSW is to cease the use of those premises as an unauthorised boarding house within 60 days of the service of a sealed copy of this order on the applicant.

2. The exhibits, except 1, are returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.