Khoury v Bradmill Group Ltd

Case

[1987] FCA 797

17 Dec 1987

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY No. G511 of 1987

GENERAL DIVISION

-- BETWEEN :

Manufacturing and formerly
known as Radna Clothing

Manufacturing

Applicant

AND :

~ BRADMILL GROUP LIMITED

Respondent

CORAM: M. L. FOSTER, J.

DATE :  17 December, 1987.
-

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

HIS HONOUR: These proceedings were set down for a full interlocutory hearing in which interlocutory relief in the

anticipated would be made today. FEDEAALCOUHTOF
nature of an injunction was sought by the applicant. It

is apparent from the file that a timetable was set down on
a fairly urgent basis and that affidavits, which are quite

numerous and lengthy, have been prepared on the part of the

respondent in opposition to the appl ication, which it was

The applicant has only today indicated that it

abandons the claim for interlocutory relief. It appears
that it became aware of certain facts on discovery which
played a part in the forming of that decision and that those
facts only became available quite recently. However, in
all the circumstances, I do not see that that fact carries
sufficient weight to produce a different result from what
must be regarded as the usual and proper result in a
situation such as this; namely, that the applicants, in
abandoning their application, renders themselves liable
for the respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the

application not proceeding.

In the circumstances, the application for

interlocutory relief having been abandoned, the application
is dismissed and I order that the applicants' pay the

respondent's costs.

So far as the application for security for costs

is concerned, I am satisfied that it is necessary for the applicants to file an affidavit upon which to base their

submissions that no such order should be made. It seems

that some misunderstanding has occurred as to the listing of

that matter today, in any event.

Clearly the applicants are not in a position to

proceed. I consider that the appropriate order to make in ,
l

that case is that it be stood-over, restorable on two days

notice and that the costs of today be reserved.

1. cert,ify that t h i n and the I plaoalitrg

pages are a true copy c d the reason8 fi,,r

j udgmeut herein of Ilia Honour, Mr. Just&
lbtoster.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0