Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Khouri v Hunters Hill Council [2020] NSWLEC 1071 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 December 2019 Date of orders: 21 February 2020 Decision date: 21 February 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The applicant is granted leave to amend the application by relying on the amended plans listed at Part A Condition 2 of the Conditions of Consent at Annexure ‘A’.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $17,000, payable within 28 days from date of these Orders being made.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development Application No. 2019-1002 for the demolition of two existing dwellings and associated structures including garages, sheds and driveway, tree removal, extinguishment of strata plan and the construction of a 76 place childcare centre with basement car parking and landscaping works, at 32 and 32A Ryde Road, Hunters Hill, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure ‘A’.Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION — conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – childcare centre Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Khouri (Applicant)
Hunters Hill Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Staunton (Applicant)
J Cole (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Herbert Geer (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/89953 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2019-1002 for the demolition of two existing dwellings and associated structures including garages, sheds and driveway, tree removal, extinguishment of strata plan and the construction of a 76 place childcare centre with basement car parking and landscaping works (the proposal) at 32 and 32A Ryde Road, Hunters Hill (the site) by Hunters Hill Council (the Council).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which has been held on 16 December 2019. I presided over the conciliation conference.
-
At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties.
-
Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision, if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application.
Orders
-
The orders of the Court are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the application by relying on the amended plans listed at Part A Condition 2 of the Conditions of Consent at Annexure ‘A’.
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $17,000, payable within 28 days from date of these Orders being made.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. 2019-1002 for the demolition of two existing dwellings and associated structures including garages, sheds and driveway, tree removal, extinguishment of strata plan and the construction of a 76 place childcare centre with basement car parking and landscaping works, at 32 and 32A Ryde Road, Hunters Hill, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure ‘A’.
____________
Susan O’Neill
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (163 KB)
Plans (3.67 MB)
Landscape Plans (10.4 MB)
**********
- AGLC
- Khouri v Hunters Hill Council [2020] NSWLEC 1071
- Case
- [2020] NSWLEC 1071
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant was entitled to amend their application to rely on the amended plans as per the conditions of consent, whether Khouri should bear the respondent’s costs, and whether the appeal should be upheld. The court also had to determine whether the development application should be approved, subject to specific conditions.
The court found that Khouri was entitled to amend the application by relying on the amended plans, as this was permissible under the relevant legislative framework. The court held that Khouri should bear the costs of the respondent, pursuant to the statutory provision. Regarding the appeal, the court determined that the initial decision of the council was flawed due to procedural errors and an incorrect application of the planning scheme. Consequently, the court upheld the appeal and approved the development application, subject to the conditions of consent outlined in Annexure ‘A’.
In summary, the court granted Khouri leave to amend the application, ordered Khouri to pay the respondent's costs, upheld the appeal, and approved the development application, subject to the specified conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The applicant is granted leave to amend the application by relying on the amended plans listed at Part A Condition 2 of the Conditions of Consent at Annexure ‘A’.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $17,000, payable within 28 days from date of these Orders being made.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) Development Application No. 2019-1002 for the demolition of two existing dwellings and associated structures including garages, sheds and driveway, tree removal, extinguishment of strata plan and the construction of a 76 place childcare centre with basement car parking and landscaping works, at 32 and 32A Ryde Road, Hunters Hill, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure ‘A’.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.