Khosa (Migration)
[2018] AATA 1151
•4 April 2018
Khosa (Migration) [2018] AATA 1151 (4 April 2018)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Karanpal Khosa
CASE NUMBER: 1732125
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/3141498
MEMBER:Tim Connellan
DATE:4 April 2018
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 04 April 2018 at 10:48am
CATCHWORDS
Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 visa – New evidence provided to the Tribunal – Applicant’s condition of enrolmentLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2 cl 500.211STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 30 August 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 30 November 2017.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of enrolment was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
On 29 January 2018 the Tribunal received a CoE (96A35E26) which showed the applicant was enrolled in a Bachelor of Business scheduled to run between 12 March 2018 and 31 December 2020.
In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Tim Connellan
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0