KFarm Produce Pty Ltd (Migration)

KFarm Produce Pty Ltd (Migration) [2022] AATA 3982 (7 November 2022)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: KFarm Produce Pty Ltd

REPRESENTATIVE:  Miss Amen Karim
CASE NUMBER:  1915219
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2017/4209449
MEMBER:De-Anne Kelly
DATE:7 November 2022
PLACE OF DECISION:  Brisbane
DECISION:The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a decision approving the nomination.

Statement made on 07 November 2022 at 9:53am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – application for approval of nomination of position – Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme – direct entry stream – office manager – need for position – nominee’s ongoing work in position allows director to do own tasks – business’s operations and performance during and after COVID restrictions – labour shortages in sector – decision under review set aside
LEGISLATION
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 5.19(4)(a)(ii)
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 4 June 2019 to reject the applicant’s application for approval of the nomination of a position in Australia under reg 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).
The applicant applied for approval on 10 November 2017. The requirements for the approval of the nomination of a position in Australia are found in reg 5.19 of the Regulations which contains two alternative streams: a Temporary Residence Transition nomination stream (reg 5.19(3)) and a Direct Entry nomination stream (reg 5.19(4)). If the application is made in accordance with reg 5.19(2) and meets the requirements of either stream, then the application must be approved. If any of the requirements are not met then the application must be refused: reg 5.19(5).
In this case, the applicant has applied for approval of a nomination, seeking to satisfy the criteria in the Direct Entry nomination stream.
The delegate refused the application on the basis the applicant’s nomination did not satisfy reg 5.19(a)(ii) of the Regulations because there did appear to be a need for the nominator to employ a paid employee to work in the position under the nominators direct control.
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 28 October 2022 to give evidence and present arguments.
The applicant was represented in relation to the review by Ms Stephanou and later by Ms Amen Karim.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to set aside the decision under review and substitute a decision approving the nomination.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
The issue in this case is whether the applicant meets the requirements for approval of the nomination under the Direct Entry nomination stream set out in reg 5.19(4), which is extracted in the attachment to this decision. For the nomination to be approved, all the requirements must be met.
On 10 November 2017 the applicant lodged a Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme employer nomination visa subclass 187 in the Direct Entry Stream for the position of Office Manager on $45,000 per annum to be employed in Toowoomba QLD 4350 in favour of Mr Maninder Singh.
Mr Owen Brosnan the director gave an overview of the business. He was forthright and transparent with the Tribunal. They have a number of entities which produce free range eggs and salads. K Farm employs 5 to 6 people who work across the three entities. The nominee started with them in 2015 and is the office manager and enables Mr Brosnan to do the actual farming. COVID affected them severely as it shut the restaurants to which they supplied produce and they are still recovering. Many customers did not pay bills during that time. They have switched to supplying wholesalers and also do farmers markets with seven markets they service. However staffing shortages are a constraint on this with shortages of drivers quite difficult. The nominee arranges Punjabi drivers for their operation and this is a significant help to the applicant.
The application is compliant: reg 5.19(4)(a)
Regulation 5.19(4)(a) requires that the application for approval must be in the approved form, must be accompanied by the prescribed fee, and, where applicable, must include the required written certification relating to conduct that contravenes s 245AR(1). The application must also identify a need for the nominator to employ an identified person as a paid employee to work in the position under their direct control.
Applications must be in the approved form and must be accompanied by the prescribed fee to be valid and acknowledged by the Department of Home Affairs. An acknowledgement dated 10 November 2017 was sent by the Department to the nominator as evidence of a valid application. The Department accepted a declaration made on the online form that the nominator had responded yes in the online form to the following: ‘the applicant certifies that they have not engaged in conduct in relation to this nomination that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR (1) of the Migration Act 1958’.
The Tribunal is satisfied that the application was made on the approved form 1395 (Internet) for post 23 March 2013 applications, accompanied by the prescribed fee and the nominator has included a written certification stating the nominator has not engaged in conduct in relation to the nomination that contravenes s.245AR(1) of the Act.
Regulation 5.19(4)(a)(ii) requires the nominator to identify a need for the nominator to employ a paid employee to work in the position under the nominator’s control. The assessment of the need for a paid employee comprises two parts: establishing the need for an employee (i.e. there exists a vacancy for the nominated position) and ascertaining that the relationship between the nominator and nominee is that of employer and employee.
The nomination does not have to specify the nominee but needs to identify a nominee before, or at the time, the associated visa application is made. Mr Maninder Singh was identified in the nomination application, and this indicates there is a need for the position.
The Tribunal accepts for the reasons given above that Mr Brosnan needs someone to manage the office and has had difficulty in attracting a reliable person to undertake this role.
Accordingly, the requirement in r.5.19(4)(a) is met
Nominator is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia: reg 5.19(4)(b)
Regulation 5.19(4)(b) requires that the applicant is actively, lawfully and directly operating a business in Australia.
Financial information for FY 2020 to FY 2021 and BAS statements to FY 2022 was provided and the director confirmed that the business is actively operating.
Accordingly, the requirement in reg 5.19(4)(b) is met.
Position is not labour-hire: reg 5.19(4)(c)
Regulation 5.19(4)(c) applies to nominators whose business activities include those relating to labour hire to an unrelated business. In these cases, the nominated position must be within the business activities of the nominator.
There is no evidence that the business labour hires.
Accordingly, the requirement in reg 5.19(4)(c) is met.
Term of employment of the visa holder: reg 5.19(4)(d)
Regulation 5.19(4)(d) requires the nominee to be employed in the nominated position for at least 2 years full time, and the terms and conditions of that employment do not expressly exclude the possibility of an extension.
Financial figures show a profitable business as below and the BAS statements indicate that the revenue will remain strong. Mr Brosnan’s wife started the business in 1982 and it is now very much a family business which they intend to hand onto their son. The nominated position is a ongoing and long term. COVID -19 really affected them but the biggest constraint is labour shortages. The egg price has been a roller coaster although it has risen now. Lettuce prices were through the roof.

Year 2021 2020

Revenue      1,438,071      2,115,770

Wages         185,842         216,990

Profit           84,420           19,292

The employment contract 1 July 2022 for a salary of $53,900 per annum does not expressly exclude the possibility of an extension and Mr Brosnan wishes the nominee to remain as long as possible with them.
Accordingly, the requirement in reg 5.19(4)(d) is met.
No less favourable terms and conditions of employment: reg 5.19(4)(e)
Regulation 5.19(4)(e) requires that the terms and conditions of employment applicable to the nominated position will be no less favourable than those that are, or would be, provided to an Australian citizen or permanent resident performing equivalent work in the same workplace at the same location.
Payscale shows that Office Manager positions range in salary from $49,000 to $84,000 per annum and therefore $53,900 is a fair market salary.
Accordingly, the requirements of reg 5.19(4)(e) are met.
No adverse information known to Immigration: reg 5.19(4)(f)
Regulation 5.19(4)(f) requires that there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or person associated with the nominator; or it is reasonable to disregard any such information. For these purposes, ‘adverse information’ and ‘associated with’ have the meaning given in regs 1.13A and 1.13B.
The Tribunal has no information before it from the Department that would constitute adverse information and a search of the ASIC website finds no adverse information about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator. The director confirmed this in the hearing.
Accordingly, the requirements of r.5.19(4)(f) are met.
Satisfactory compliance with workplace relations laws: reg 5.19(4)(g)
Regulation 5.19(4)(g) requires that the applicant has a satisfactory record of compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth, and of each State or Territory in which the applicant operates a business and employs employees in the business, relating to workplace relations.
The Tribunal can find no unsatisfactory record of compliance for the applicant with the laws of the Commonwealth relating to workplace relations. This was confirmed by the President at the hearing.
Accordingly, the requirements of r.5.19(4)(g) are met.
Tasks of the position, genuine need for the position and training requirements reg 5.19(4)(h)
Regulation 5.19(4)(h) contains a number of alternative requirements. These are set out in detail in the attachment to the decision but can be briefly summarised as requiring either that:
·the tasks to be performed in the position will be performed in Australia and correspond to those of an occupation specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument, the occupation is applicable to the proposed employee in accordance with any specifications made in that instrument, there is a genuine need for the nominee to be employed as a paid employee in the position, and certain specified training requirements are met; or
·the position and nominator’s business is located in regional Australia, there is a genuine need for the nominee to be employed as a paid employee in the position under the nominator’s direct control, the position cannot be filled by a locally resident Australian citizen or permanent resident, the tasks of the position correspond to those of an occupation specified in the relevant legislative instrument, the occupation is applicable to the proposed employee in accordance with the specification of the occupation, and that a regional certifying body has advised the Minister about certain matters relating to the position.
Position in regional area – r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(A)
The Tribunal needs to determine if the position is in regional Australia. The business is located in Toowoomba QLD 4350. The definition of ‘Regional Australia’ is found in IMMI 16/045. This postcode is included in the list of postcodes for designated regional areas (IMMI 16/045) therefore the position and business are located in regional Australia. The applicant can choose therefore to meet either r.5.19(4)(h)(i) or r.5.19(4)(h)(ii). The applicant has chosen to meet r.5.19(4)(h)(ii) which provides for the second dot point above.
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(A) is met.
Genuine need for the position r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(B).
The Tribunal needs to consider if there is a genuine need for the applicant to employ a paid employee to work in the position under the nominator’s control.
The nominee has been working in the position from January 2018 to the present day and documents such as invoices and supplier orders etc referencing Mr Singh as actioning them were provided. Mr Brosnan was a credible witness and stated that the nominee was required because of the excessive paperwork required to identify eggs as originating from a particular shed on a particular day and the other extensive regulatory requirements that need to be met to operate the business.
The Tribunal finds for the reasons above that there is a genuine need for the nominator to employ a person, identified under r.5.19(4)(a)(ii) as a paid employee to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control.
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(B) is met.
Cannot be filled. r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(C)
The Tribunal needs to consider if the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is living in the same local area.
The RCB stated that sufficient evidence had been presented to them to satisfy this requirement. The applicant advertised the position on Seek and in the Toowoomba Chronicle in October 2017 and received 5 responses however none were suitable.
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(C) is met.
Tasks of the position correspond to ANZSCO. r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D)
The Tribunal has carefully considered the evidence provided at hearing and the Position Description provided and finally determined that the tasks of the position generally correspond to the tasks of a position specified by the Minister in an instrument being the position of company Office Manager.
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D) is met.
Occupation applicable to nominee. r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(DA)
The nominee has a Diploma of Business. The Tribunal finds that the occupation is applicable to the person, identified under subparagraph (a)(ii) in accordance with the specification of the occupation.
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(DA) is met.
Business operated at that place. r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(E)
The business of the nominator is located at Toowoomba QLD 4350 and is in ‘that place’ that was specified in the employer nomination.
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(E) is met.
Regional certifying body r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(F)
Chamber of Commerce and Industry Queensland CCIQ as the regional certifying body RCB specified in the Ministerial instrument on 7 November 2017 certified the application as meeting r.5.19(4)(e) and r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(B) & (C) and has therefore advised the Minister about the matters mentioned in paragraph (e) and sub-subparagraph (B) and (C).
Accordingly, r.5.19(4)(h)(ii)(F) is met.
Accordingly, the requirements of r.5.19(4)(h) and r.5.19(4) are met.
Based on the findings above, the Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant meets the requirements of reg 5.19 for approval of the nomination of the position in Australia.
DECISION
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a decision approving the nomination.
De-Anne Kelly
Member

ATTACHMENT - Extracts from the Migration Regulations 1994
5.19Approval of nominated positions (employer nomination)
…
(2)The application must:
(a)be made in accordance with approved form 1395…; and
(aa) include a written certification by the nominator stating whether or not the nominator has engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR(1) of the Act; and
(b)be accompanied by the fee mentioned in regulation 5.37.
…
Direct Entry nomination
(4)The Minister must, in writing, approve a nomination if:
(a)the application for approval:
(i)       is made in accordance with subregulation (2); and
(ii)      identifies a need for the nominator to employ a paid employee to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control; and
(b)the nominator:
(i)       is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia; and
(ii)      directly operates the business; and
(c)for a nominator whose business activities include activities relating to the hiring of labour to other unrelated businesses — the position is within the business activities of the nominator and not for hire to other unrelated businesses; and
(d)both of the following apply:
(i)       the employee will be employed on a full-time basis in the position for at least 2 years;
(ii)      the terms and conditions of the employee’s employment will not include an express exclusion of the possibility of extending the period of employment; and
(e)the terms and conditions of employment applicable to the position will be no less favourable than the terms and conditions that:
(i)       are provided; or
(ii)      would be provided;
to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident for performing equivalent work in the same workplace at the same location; and
(f)either:
(i)       there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; or
(ii)      it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; and
(g)the nominator has a satisfactory record of compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth, and of each State or Territory in which the applicant operates a business and employs employees in the business, relating to workplace relations; and
(h)either:
(i)       all of the following apply:
(A)the tasks to be performed in the position will be performed in Australia and correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph;
(AA)there is a genuine need for the nominator to employ the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii), as a paid employee, to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control;
(AAA)the occupation is applicable to the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii) in accordance with the specification of the occupation;
(B)either:
(I)the nominator’s business has operated for at least 12 months, and the nominator meets the requirements for the training of Australian citizens and Australian permanent residents that are specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-sub-subparagraph; or
(II)the nominator’s business has operated for less than 12 months, and the nominator has an auditable plan for meeting the requirements specified in the instrument mentioned in sub-sub-subparagraph (I); or
(ii)      all of the following apply:
(A)the position is located in regional Australia;
(B)there is a genuine need for the nominator to employ the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii), as a paid employee, to work in the position under the nominator’s direct control;
(C)the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident who is living in the same local area as that place;
(D)the tasks to be performed in the position correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph;
(DA)the occupation is applicable to the person identified under subparagraph (a)(ii) in accordance with the specification of the occupation;
(E)the business operated by the nominator is located at that place;
(F)a body that is:
(I)specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this sub-subparagraph; and
(II)located in the same State or Territory as the location of the position;
has advised the Minister about the matters mentioned in paragraph (e) and sub-subparagraphs (B) and (C).

[2022] AATA 3982

7 November 2022

Key Legal Topics

Areas of Law

Immigration

Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

Judicial Review

Procedural Fairness

Statutory Construction

Jurisdiction

Year	2021	2020
Revenue	1,438,071	2,115,770
Wages	185,842	216,990
Profit	84,420	19,292