| [2015] FWCA 5326 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Keysbrook Leucoxene Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4129)
KEYSBROOK LEUCOXENE PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Mining industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 5 AUGUST 2015 |
Application for approval of the Keysbrook Leucoxene Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Keysbrook Leucoxene Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Keysbrook Leucoxene Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 5 August 2015 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 August 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE415095 PR570155>
- AGLC
- Keysbrook Leucoxene Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 5326
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5326
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Enterprise Agreement 2015 complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly sections concerning the procedural fairness and the substantive content of the agreement. The Court had to assess if the agreement was genuinely negotiated, free from coercion or undue influence, and if it met the Fair Work Act's criteria for approval. Additionally, the Court examined if the agreement contained all necessary terms and conditions, including those mandated by the Act.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and met all the requirements for procedural fairness. The Court determined that the agreement was free from coercion and undue influence and contained all the necessary terms and conditions as required by the Fair Work Act. Furthermore, the Court concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and met the standards for approval. Consequently, the Court approved the Enterprise Agreement 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.