FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1)
Keymer & Keymer (No 2) [2023] FedCFamC1F 485
File number(s): BRC 976 of 2019 Judgment of: GILL J Date of judgment: 16 June 2023 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PARENTING – Family violence by the mother against the father – Emotional abuse by the mother – Unreliable allegations by the mother against the father – Manipulation of the child to further conflict between the parties – Consideration of the risk of mother spending time with the child balanced with the benefit of a meaningful relationship – Order for recognition time with the mother – Injunction heavily restraining mother’s communication with child – Time spent with mother to be determined by taking into account child’s wishes after a certain age Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) - ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 65DAA, 69ZW, 102NA
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 - r 10.6
Cases cited: Eastley & Eastley [2022] FedCFamC1A 101
Isles & Nelissen [2022] FedCFamC1A 97
Jollie & Dysart [2014] FamCAFC 149
Malburon v Waldlow [2013] FamCAFC 191
Marsden & Winch (No 3) [2007] FamCA 1364
Phillips & Hansford (2019) 60 Fam LR 160
Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 129 Date of hearing: 5-8 June 2023 Place: Canberra Solicitor for the Applicant: Litigant in Person Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Haddock Solicitor for the Respondent: KPW Lawyers Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Ms Cruise, Legal Aid, ACT ORDERS
BRC 976 of 2019 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MS KEYMER
Applicant
AND: MR KEYMER
Respondent
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER
order made by:
GILL J
DATE OF ORDER:
16 JUNE 2023
THE COURT ORDERS:
1.That all previous parenting orders be discharged.
Parental Responsibility
2.That the respondent father (‘the father’) have sole parental responsibility for the child X, born 2011 (‘the child’).
3.That the father have sole parental responsibility for the purpose of applying for a passport to be issued for the child from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of the Commonwealth of Australia pursuant to section 11(1)(b)(i) of the Australian Passports Act 2005 or renewing a passport for the child, without the consent of the mother, and has leave pursuant to section 65Y(2)(b) of the Family Law Act 1975 to take the child outside of the Commonwealth of Australia or permit the child to travel outside of the Commonwealth of Australia.
Lives with/spends time with
4.That the child live with the father.
5.That, until the child reaches the age of 15 years, the child spend time with the mother as follows:
(a)On one (1) occasion every three (3) months for no less than 4 hours on the following basis:
(i)The time to be professionally supervised by an agreed professional supervisor or, failing agreement, to occur at the D Contact Centre in City A;
(ii)The costs of the supervision to be shared equally between the parents; and
(iii)The first occasion will occur on…
Continue reading Keymer & Keymer (No 2)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Keymer & Keymer (No 2) [2023] FedCFamC1F 485
- Case
- [2023] FedCFamC1F 485
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate living arrangements for X, the exercise of parental responsibility, and the conditions under which X would spend time with the mother. The court had to balance the need to protect X from harm against the child's right to maintain a relationship with both parents. Additionally, the court considered the proposals by the ICL regarding the necessary restraints on the parties to ensure the safety and wellbeing of X.
In reaching its decision, the court found that the proposed restraints by the ICL were appropriate given the potential for emotional harm. The court accepted that these measures were necessary for the personal protection of both the father and the child. Consequently, the court granted orders largely as sought by the ICL. These orders stipulated that X would live with the father, with the father exercising sole parental responsibility. X was to spend supervised recognition time with the mother on specified dates, subject to agreement to vary or the mother's court attendance on the scheduled day.
The court's decision ensured that X would have a structured and safe environment to grow up in, while also allowing for a controlled relationship with the mother. This balanced approach aimed to mitigate the risks of emotional harm and support the best interests of the child.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.