Kevin Maher under section 218 of the Worplace Relations Act 1996 and elections in National Construction Branch of the Australian Workers' Union
[1997] FCA 1623
•5 May 1997
| JUDGMENT No. .!.k.~1.... | ~;1.3iL? |
| 3. .- |
| IN THE IWUSTRIATJ RELATIOKS COURT | 1 | ||
| OF AUSTRALTA |
|
| VIC'I'CRIA-DISTRIXT | REGISTRY | 1 |
IN TESE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY KEVIN
MAHEK UNDER SECTION 218 OF THE WORKPUCE RELATIONS ACT 1996 IN RELATION TO
ELECTIONS IN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION BRANCEL
OF THE AUSTIIALIAN WORKERSf UNION
| Coram: | Ryan J | |||
| D a t e - : |
|
| S, ,/ | Place': | Melbourne |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
RYAU J: This inquiry concerns an election to f i l l a c a s u a l vacailcy or casual vacancies, the term of which will expire on 30 June this year. Nominations f o r eiections to gill the same and other offices f o r the f u l l term of four years to commcrlce
-.-
on 1 July 1997 closed on 9 April 1997. There is evidence t ha t
| f o x most, | if not all, of those o f f i c e s , | inciudling those held |
by persons whose elections to fill casual vacancies in them
have been challenged, there are not s u f f i c i e n t nominations to
| r e q ~ i r e | the returning officer to conduct a ballot. |
| The basis of t h ~ | present inquiry went to tks cor1otitutiol:r of |
the rolls of voters used in the election to fill the casual
vac-mcies. Irregularities were said to have occurred i n the
failure to transfer members from other Branches of the Uniolz
to the National Construction Branch ( l1 the NCBII) i n accordance
| with Rule 3 6 ( n ) . As well, it was asserted | khak ce r t a in rneml~ere |
- 2 -
of other Branches who were not eligible for membership of [-,he
NCB and some fifty-two other personG who are not finarlcial
members of t h e Union had been included on the NCB roll f o r thc
e l e c t i o n to fill the casual vacancies,
F i ~ ~ a l l y , it was asserted that other persons who had validly
become members of the NCB had not been included on the r o l l .
In these c i r c u m s t a n c e s , having regard to the very short time
which w i l l elapse during which the casual 'vacancies will
| ,'+ | continue to be filled, I consider it a proper exercise of tlia Court's discretion t o terminate the inquiry pursuant to | |
| S , 223 ( 5 ) . However, because of t h e prima f a c i e force o f the | ||
| evidence on which the applicant r e l i e d , which has not so far | ||
| been t h e subject of a complete challenge i n t h e s e proceedings | ||
| and which was sufficient to persuade a Judge of t h i s Cour t to | ||
| i x l e t i t u t e the inquixy, 1 consider it appropriate t o certify | ||
| pursuant t o S. 343 that the applicant acted reasonably in | ||
| applying for the inquiry. I will, therefore, order: | ||
| >L | V | |
|
vacated.
2 . That the inquiry be terminated.
3 . That it be certified pursuant to s , 343 that: t he
applicant acted reasonably in applyirlg for the inquiry.
| - - | - - |
| . . -..--.-C | ----..-..--.- |
| . ., - | . , , -- .,-'L | . .. ... | , . - ..,.(I-.. | . | . | - |
| E : sd | 8? | :TT | EB/SB/Z0 |
Electoral comrnlsslon
I certify that this and the preceding t w o
(2) pages are a true copy of the Reasons
for Judgment of h i s Honour Justice Ryan,
Associate:
| Counsel f o r Mr K. Maher | : MS A. Chambers |
| solicitors for Mr K. Maher | : Maurice Blackburn & CO |
| Counsel for Messrs Busby, | : Mr P. Punch |
| Patterson and Gries | : Carroll & OIDea |
| Solicitors f o r Messrs Busby, | : Mr P. Punch |
| Patterson and Gries | : Carroll & O'Dea |
| Counsel for the Australiarl | : Mr G. Thorley |
| Elec tora l | commission |
| Solicitors Ear the Australian | : | Mr G , Thorley |
| Electoral Commission |
| Date of Hearing | : 5 May 1997 | ||
| D a t e o f Judgment |
|
0
0