| JUDGMENT No. .!.k.~1.... | ~;1.3iL? |
| 3. .- |
| IN THE IWUSTRIATJ RELATIOKS COURT | 1 | ||
| OF AUSTRALTA |
|
| VIC'I'CRIA-DISTRIXT | REGISTRY | 1 |
IN TESE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY KEVIN
MAHEK UNDER SECTION 218 OF THE WORKPUCE RELATIONS ACT 1996 IN RELATION TO
ELECTIONS IN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION BRANCEL
OF THE AUSTIIALIAN WORKERSf UNION
| Coram: | Ryan J | |||
| D a t e - : |
|
| S, ,/ | Place': | Melbourne |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
RYAU J: This inquiry concerns an election to f i l l a c a s u a l vacailcy or casual vacancies, the term of which will expire on 30 June this year. Nominations f o r eiections to gill the same and other offices f o r the f u l l term of four years to commcrlce
-.-
on 1 July 1997 closed on 9 April 1997. There is evidence t ha t
| f o x most, | if not all, of those o f f i c e s , | inciudling those held |
by persons whose elections to fill casual vacancies in them
have been challenged, there are not s u f f i c i e n t nominations to
| r e q ~ i r e | the returning officer to conduct a ballot. |
| The basis of t h ~ | present inquiry went to tks cor1otitutiol:r of |
the rolls of voters used in the election to fill the casual
vac-mcies. Irregularities were said to have occurred i n the
failure to transfer members from other Branches of the Uniolz
to the National Construction Branch ( l1 the NCBII) i n accordance
| with Rule 3 6 ( n ) . As well, it was asserted | khak ce r t a in rneml~ere |
- 2 -
of other Branches who were not eligible for membership of [-,he
NCB and some fifty-two other personG who are not finarlcial
members of t h e Union had been included on the NCB roll f o r thc
e l e c t i o n to fill the casual vacancies,
F i ~ ~ a l l y , it was asserted that other persons who had validly
become members of the NCB had not been included on the r o l l .
In these c i r c u m s t a n c e s , having regard to the very short time
which w i l l elapse during which the casual 'vacancies will
| ,'+ | continue to be filled, I consider it a proper exercise of tlia Court's discretion t o terminate the inquiry pursuant to | |
| S , 223 ( 5 ) . However, because of t h e prima f a c i e force o f the | ||
| evidence on which the applicant r e l i e d , which has not so far | ||
| been t h e subject of a complete challenge i n t h e s e proceedings | ||
| and which was sufficient to persuade a Judge of t h i s Cour t to | ||
| i x l e t i t u t e the inquixy, 1 consider it appropriate t o certify | ||
| pursuant t o S. 343 that the applicant acted reasonably in | ||
| applying for the inquiry. I will, therefore, order: | ||
| >L | V | |
|
vacated.
2 . That the inquiry be terminated.
3 . That it be certified pursuant to s , 343 that: t he
applicant acted reasonably in applyirlg for the inquiry.
| - - | - - |
| . . -..--.-C | ----..-..--.- |
| . ., - | . , , -- .,-'L | . .. ... | , . - ..,.(I-.. | . | . | - |
| E : sd | 8? | :TT | EB/SB/Z0 |
Electoral comrnlsslon
I certify that this and the preceding t w o
(2) pages are a true copy of the Reasons
for Judgment of h i s Honour Justice Ryan,
Associate:
| Counsel f o r Mr K. Maher | : MS A. Chambers |
| solicitors for Mr K. Maher | : Maurice Blackburn & CO |
| Counsel for Messrs Busby, | : Mr P. Punch |
| Patterson and Gries | : Carroll & OIDea |
| Solicitors f o r Messrs Busby, | : Mr P. Punch |
| Patterson and Gries | : Carroll & O'Dea |
| Counsel for the Australiarl | : Mr G. Thorley |
| Elec tora l | commission |
| Solicitors Ear the Australian | : | Mr G , Thorley |
| Electoral Commission |
| Date of Hearing | : 5 May 1997 | ||
| D a t e o f Judgment |
|
- AGLC
- Kevin Maher under section 218 of the Worplace Relations Act 1996 and elections in National Construction Branch of the Australian Workers' Union [1997] FCA 1623
- Case
- [1997] FCA 1623
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the irregularities in the voter rolls were significant enough to warrant an investigation into the election process. The central legal issues involved the validity of the voter rolls and whether the irregularities could potentially affect the fairness and integrity of the election. The court also had to consider the appropriateness of terminating the inquiry due to the short time remaining for the casual vacancies to be filled.
Justice Ryan concluded that while the irregularities raised valid concerns, the short time frame until the vacancies would expire warranted the termination of the inquiry. However, given the prima facie strength of the evidence presented by Mr. Maher, which had not been fully contested, the court deemed it appropriate to certify that Mr. Maher acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry. Consequently, the court ordered the inquiry to be terminated but certified the reasonableness of Mr. Maher's application.
This decision balanced the need to address potential irregularities with the practicalities of the election timeline, ensuring that the court's intervention was both timely and proportionate to the issues at hand.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.