Kevin Maher under section 218 of the Worplace Relations Act 1996 and elections in National Construction Branch of the Australian Workers' Union

Case [1997] FCA 1623


JUDGMENT No. .!.k.~1....

~;1.3iL?

3. .-

IN THE IWUSTRIATJ RELATIOKS COURT

1

OF AUSTRALTA

1

No. V1 2339 of 1996

VIC'I'CRIA-DISTRIXT

REGISTRY

1

IN TESE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY KEVIN

MAHEK UNDER SECTION 218 OF THE WORKPUCE RELATIONS ACT 1996 IN RELATION TO

ELECTIONS IN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION BRANCEL

OF THE AUSTIIALIAN WORKERSf UNION

Coram:

Ryan J

D a t e - :

S

May

1997

S, ,/

Place':

Melbourne

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RYAU J: This inquiry concerns an election to f i l l a c a s u a l vacailcy or casual vacancies, the term of which will expire on 30 June this year. Nominations f o r eiections to gill the same and other offices f o r the f u l l term of four years to commcrlce

-.-

on 1 July 1997 closed on 9 April 1997. There is evidence t ha t

f o x most,

if not all, of those o f f i c e s ,

inciudling those held

by persons whose elections to fill casual vacancies in them

have been challenged, there are not s u f f i c i e n t nominations to

r e q ~ i r e

the returning officer to conduct a ballot.

The basis of t h ~

present inquiry went to tks cor1otitutiol:r of

the rolls of voters used in the election to fill the casual

vac-mcies. Irregularities were said to have occurred i n the

failure to transfer members from other Branches of the Uniolz

to the National Construction Branch ( l1 the NCBII) i n accordance

with Rule 3 6 ( n ) . As well, it was asserted

khak ce r t a in rneml~ere

- 2 -

of other Branches who were not eligible for membership of [-,he

NCB and some fifty-two other personG who are not finarlcial

members of t h e Union had been included on the NCB roll f o r thc

e l e c t i o n to fill the casual vacancies,

F i ~ ~ a l l y , it was asserted that other persons who had validly

become members of the NCB had not been included on the r o l l .

In these c i r c u m s t a n c e s , having regard to the very short time

which w i l l elapse during which the casual 'vacancies will

,'+

continue to be filled, I consider it a proper exercise of tlia Court's discretion t o terminate the inquiry pursuant to

S , 223 ( 5 ) . However, because of t h e prima f a c i e force o f the

evidence on which the applicant r e l i e d , which has not so far

been t h e subject of a complete challenge i n t h e s e proceedings

and which was sufficient to persuade a Judge of t h i s Cour t to

i x l e t i t u t e the inquixy, 1 consider it appropriate t o certify

pursuant t o S. 343 that the applicant acted reasonably in

applying for the inquiry. I will, therefore, order:

>L

V

1.

T h a t the directions made by myself on 28 February 1997 he

vacated.

2 . That the inquiry be terminated.

3 .     That it be certified pursuant to s , 343 that: t he

applicant acted reasonably in applyirlg for the inquiry.

- -

- -

. . -..--.-C

----..-..--.-

. ., -

. , , -- .,-'L

. .. ...

, . - ..,.(I-..

.

.

-

E : sd

8?

:TT

EB/SB/Z0

Electoral comrnlsslon

I certify that this and the preceding t w o

(2) pages are a true copy of the Reasons

for Judgment of h i s Honour Justice Ryan,

Associate:

Counsel f o r Mr K. Maher

: MS A. Chambers

solicitors for Mr K. Maher

: Maurice Blackburn & CO

Counsel for Messrs Busby,

: Mr P. Punch

Patterson and Gries

: Carroll & OIDea

Solicitors f o r Messrs Busby,

: Mr P. Punch

Patterson and Gries

: Carroll & O'Dea

Counsel for the Australiarl

: Mr G. Thorley

Elec tora l

commission

Solicitors Ear the Australian

:

Mr G , Thorley

Electoral Commission

Date of Hearing

: 5 May 1997

D a t e o f Judgment

:

S May 1997

Details
AGLC
Kevin Maher under section 218 of the Worplace Relations Act 1996 and elections in National Construction Branch of the Australian Workers' Union [1997] FCA 1623
Case
[1997] FCA 1623
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Industrial Relations Court of Australia presided over by Justice Ryan heard an application by Kevin Maher concerning an election within the National Construction Branch of the Australian Workers' Union. The application, made under Section 218 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996, focused on irregularities in the election process for filling casual vacancies within the union. The primary dispute centred on the constitution of the voter rolls used in these elections, alleging non-compliance with Rule 36(n) of the union's constitution. Specifically, there were claims that eligible members from other branches had not been transferred to the National Construction Branch, ineligible members had been included, and eligible members had been omitted from the rolls.

The court was tasked with determining whether the irregularities in the voter rolls were significant enough to warrant an investigation into the election process. The central legal issues involved the validity of the voter rolls and whether the irregularities could potentially affect the fairness and integrity of the election. The court also had to consider the appropriateness of terminating the inquiry due to the short time remaining for the casual vacancies to be filled.

Justice Ryan concluded that while the irregularities raised valid concerns, the short time frame until the vacancies would expire warranted the termination of the inquiry. However, given the prima facie strength of the evidence presented by Mr. Maher, which had not been fully contested, the court deemed it appropriate to certify that Mr. Maher acted reasonably in applying for the inquiry. Consequently, the court ordered the inquiry to be terminated but certified the reasonableness of Mr. Maher's application.

This decision balanced the need to address potential irregularities with the practicalities of the election timeline, ensuring that the court's intervention was both timely and proportionate to the issues at hand.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.