Kevin Allen and Others on behalf of Njamal and Cuvier Resources and Another

[2018] NNTTA 5

NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL

Kevin Allen & Others on behalf of Njamal and Cuvier Resources and Another [2018] NNTTA 5 (12 February 2018)

Application No: WO2017/0035

IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

- and -

IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into an expedited procedure objection application

Kevin Allen & Others on behalf of Njamal  (WC1999/008)

(native title party)

- and -

Cuvier Resources Pty Ltd

(grantee party)

- and -

State of Western Australia

(Government party)

DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATION

Tribunal:	Ms H Shurven, Member
Place:	Perth
Date:	12 February 2018

Catchwords:	Native title – future act – proposed grant of exploration licence – expedited procedure objection application – failure to comply with directions – objection application dismissed.
Legislation:	Native Title Act1993 (Cth) ss 29, 148(b)
Cases:	Teelow v Page [2001] NNTTA 107; 166 FLR 266 (‘Teelow v Page’)
Representative of the native title party:	Ms Karen Hearn, Indigenous Services Australia Pty Ltd

Representative of the grantee party: Mr Jim Hawtin, Strategic Tenement Services Pty Ltd

Representatives of the Government party:

Mr Michael McMahon, Department of Mines and Petroleum

Ms Bethany Conway, Department of Mines and Petroleum (now the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety)

REASONS FOR DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATION

Background

1. On 21 September 2017, the State Government of Western Australia gave notice under s 29 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) of its intention to grant exploration licence E46/1134 to Cuvier Resources Pty Ltd (Cuvier Resources), without requiring Cuvier Resources or the State to negotiate with the Njamal native title claim group (the Njamal claim group). The area of the proposed licence is wholly overlapped by the Njamal claim group’s native title claim (WC1999/008).

2. By including an expedited procedure statement in the public advertisement of the licence, the State has asserted that the grant can be made without such negotiation. That is, they say the grant of this licence can be made expeditiously, without negotiation between the Njamal claim group, the State, and Cuvier Resources.

3. On 20 January 2017, the Njamal claim group lodged an objection with the National Native Title Tribunal against the application of the expedited procedure to the grant of the licence. To answer the question of whether the licence can be granted in such an expedited way, I was appointed by the President of the Tribunal, Raelene Webb QC, to be the Member conducting the inquiry in this matter.

Should the inquiry proceed or should the matter be dismissed?

1. On 20 September 2017, I made directions requiring all parties to produce contentions and evidence for the conduct of the inquiry to determine whether or not the expedited procedure was attracted to the grant. The Njamal claim group was directed to provide a statement of contentions, documentary evidence and witness statements, verified where possible by affidavits, on or before 1 November 2017.

2. Neither contentions nor evidence were received from the Njamal claim group by 1 November 2017. On 25 January 2018, the State wrote to the Tribunal and all parties requesting the objection be dismissed on the basis that the Njamal claim group had failed, within a reasonable time, to proceed with the objection or comply with the Tribunal’s directions.

3. On 30 January 2018, the Tribunal wrote to the representatives of the Njamal claim group and Cuvier Resources, requesting a response to the State’s request to dismiss the objection. Parties were given until 2 February 2018 to respond.

4. The Tribunal did not receive any response or communication from the Njamal claim group in regards to the request for dismissal.

5. In considering this dismissal, I have regard to the applicable principles set out by the Tribunal in Teelow v Page (at [13]). In particular, I note the Tribunal is required to proceed as expeditiously as possible when conducting an inquiry into an expedited procedure objection.

6. In the circumstances, the Njamal claim group has been given sufficient opportunity to comply with directions set by the Tribunal, and it would be unfair to prejudice the other parties with further delays. I do not need to answer the question of whether the licence can be granted in an expedited way because I have concluded the objection should be dismissed.

Decision

1. The objection application against exploration licence E46/1134 is dismissed, according to s 148(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Ms Helen Shurven
Member
12 February 2018