Kershaw and Joyce

Case [2013] FCCA 1047


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KERSHAW & JOYCE [2013] FCCA 1047
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting – Relocation – Competing interests of meaningful relationship of child with father and the impact of relocation on mother’s parenting capacity and the child’s stability. 

Legislation:  

Family Law Act 1975 s.60CC

Hepburn & Noble (2010) FamCAFC 111
A & A: Re-location Approach (2000) FLC 93-035
Taylor & Barker [2007] FamCA 1246
Morgan & Miles (2007) FLC 93-343
AIMS v AIF (1999) CLR 160
Godfrey & Sanders [2007] FamCA 102
Goode & Goode [2006] FamCA 1346
MRR & GR [2010] HCA 4
Cales & Cales [2010] FamCAFC 237
Applicant: MR KERSHAW
Respondent: MS JOYCE
File Number: PAC 3151 of 2012
Judgment of: Judge Henderson
Hearing dates: 18 and 19 June 2013
Date of Last Submission: 19 June 2013
Delivered at: Parramatta
Delivered on: 9 August 2013

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Weaver
Solicitors for the Applicant: John Spence & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Anglin
Solicitors for the Respondent:

ORDERS

  1. That the child, X, born (omitted) 2009, live with her mother and the mother be permitted to remain living with the child in Queensland.

  2. The child spend time with her father failing the parties being able to agree as follows:

    (a)One weekend each month, with the mother to facilitate and pay for the costs of the child attending Sydney for three nights and three days in one calendar month and the father to facilitate and pay for the costs of the child spending time with him in Brisbane for three nights and three days in the other calendar month.

    (b)The time for the child to commence spending time with her father will be in Sydney the first weekend after 28 days has expired from the date of these orders. 

    (c)The child to spend one week holiday with her father in each of the gazetted Queensland school holiday periods mid-term at the cost of the mother.

    (d)For one week in Christmas each year at the cost of the father and in even-numbered years, the week holiday to include Christmas Day and Boxing Day.

    (e)In odd-numbered years the week of holiday to commence the second week in January.  

    (f)Upon the child reaching age 7, the child to spend two weeks with her father in Sydney at Christmas and travel may travel as an unaccompanied minor. 

    (g)At all other times as agreed.

  3. The parents to communicate in relation to the child via Skype or text message, and the child to have Skype communication with the father on no less than two occasions each week, and at other times as she may request. 

  4. Both parties are injuncted and restrained from speaking ill of or denigrating the other in the presence or hearing of the child or permitting and third person so to do.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Kershaw & Joyce is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AT SYDNEY

PAC…

Continue reading Kershaw and Joyce

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
KERSHAW & JOYCE [2013] FCCA 1047
Case
[2013] FCCA 1047
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Kershaw and Joyce, heard by Judge Henderson, the dispute concerned parenting orders for a child, X, born in 2009. The orders sought to establish where the child would live and the arrangements for the child to spend time with each parent.

The court was required to determine the living arrangements for the child, X, and to make orders regarding the time X would spend with her father, including the frequency, duration, location, and cost of such time. Further issues included the method and frequency of communication between the parents regarding X, and the communication between X and her father. The court also considered the need to prevent disparaging remarks about one parent in the presence of the child.

Judge Henderson ordered that X live with her mother, who was permitted to remain living with X in Queensland. The court then detailed specific arrangements for X to spend time with her father, alternating between Sydney and Brisbane on a monthly basis, with provisions for school holidays and Christmas. The orders also mandated regular Skype or text communication between the parents and between X and her father, and importantly, enjoined both parents from speaking ill of the other in X's presence or hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the child, X, born (omitted) 2009, live with her mother and the mother be permitted to remain living with the child in Queensland.

2.

The child spend time with her father failing the parties being able to agree as follows:

(a) One weekend each month, with the mother to facilitate and pay for the costs of the child attending Sydney for three nights and three days in one calendar month and the father to facilitate and pay for the costs of the child spending time with him in Brisbane for three nights and three days in the other calendar month.

(b) The time for the child to commence spending time with her father will be in Sydney the first weekend after 28 days has expired from the date of these orders.

(c) The child to spend one week holiday with her father in each of the gazetted Queensland school holiday periods mid-term at the cost of the mother.

(d) For one week in Christmas each year at the cost of the father and in even-numbered years, the week holiday to include Christmas Day and Boxing Day.

(e) In odd-numbered years the week of holiday to commence the second week in January.

(f) Upon the child reaching age 7, the child to spend two weeks with her father in Sydney at Christmas and travel may travel as an unaccompanied minor.

(g) At all other times as agreed.

3.

The parents to communicate in relation to the child via Skype or text message, and the child to have Skype communication with the father on no less than two occasions each week, and at other times as she may request.

4.

Both parties are injuncted and restrained from speaking ill of or denigrating the other in the presence or hearing of the child or permitting and third person so to do.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.