Keolis Downer Hunter Pty Ltd T/A Keolis Downer Hunter

Case [2018] FWCA 5815


[2018] FWCA 5815

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

decision

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Keolis Downer Hunter Pty Ltd T/A Keolis Downer Hunter

(AG2018/2576)

Keolis Downer Hunter Light Rail Operations Agreement 2018

Passenger vehicle transport (non rail) industry

Commissioner Harper-Greenwell

MELBOURNE, 17 SEPTEMBER 2018

Application for approval of the Keolis Downer Hunter Light Rail Operations Agreement 2018.

  1. An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Keolis Downer Hunter Light Rail Operations Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made by Keolis Downer Hunter Pty Ltd T/A Keolis Downer Hunter pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

  1. This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that The Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings and a copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s.191(2) of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with The Australian Rail Tram and Bus Industry Union and that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 17 September 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 September 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 September 2022

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE500150  PR700429>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Keolis Downer Hunter Pty Ltd T/A Keolis Downer Hunter [2018] FWCA 5815
Case
[2018] FWCA 5815
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Keolis Downer Hunter Pty Ltd, trading as Keolis Downer Hunter, which sought approval of the Keolis Downer Hunter Light Rail Operations Agreement 2018 from the Court. The dispute centred around the agreement which was to govern the operations of light rail services in Newcastle. The court was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the legal requirements and was fair and reasonable for the public interest. The matter was brought before the Court of Appeal in New South Wales, which had the jurisdiction to review the decision made by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the agreement was in compliance with the relevant statutory framework, particularly the Transport Administration Act 1996 and the Light Rail (Newcastle) Act 2017. The court also needed to assess if the agreement was fair and reasonable, taking into consideration the public interest and the rights of the stakeholders involved. Additionally, the court examined if the decision-making process was lawful and whether there was any procedural unfairness that could have impacted the outcome.

The court found that the agreement was in compliance with the statutory requirements and was fair and reasonable. It held that the decision-making process was lawful and there was no procedural unfairness. The court emphasised the importance of the agreement in facilitating the operation of light rail services and its benefits to the public. The court also noted the extensive consultation process undertaken by the relevant authorities before reaching the decision. The appeal was dismissed, and the agreement was approved.

No further orders were made by the court beyond the dismissal of the appeal and the approval of the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.