Kennedy v Egan

Case

[2011] ACTSC 163


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Kennedy v Egan [2011] ACTSC 163 [2011] ACTSC 163

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kennedy v Egan involved an appeal against a sentence imposed by the Magistrates Court of the Australian Capital Territory. Steven Robert Kennedy, the appellant, was convicted of driving with a high concentration of alcohol in his blood, specifically 0.231 grams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood, which was well above the legal limit. The offence occurred on 28 February 2009, and Kennedy was sentenced by the Learned Chief Magistrate to four months’ imprisonment, suspended immediately, a Good Behaviour Order for two years, and a disqualification from holding a driver’s licence for nine months. Kennedy appealed against the sentence on the ground that it was manifestly excessive.

The legal issues in the case centred around whether the sentence was manifestly excessive and whether the Learned Chief Magistrate failed to accord procedural fairness by not giving Kennedy an opportunity to make submissions on the more severe penalty and in not providing reasons for the order of imprisonment. The court had to determine if the sentence imposed by the Magistrates Court was appropriate and whether there were any specific errors in the exercise of the sentencing discretion.

The court concluded that the sentence imposed by the Magistrates Court was manifestly excessive. While the offence was serious, the court considered various factors such as Kennedy’s high blood alcohol concentration, his previous conviction (though it was over ten years prior and now a spent conviction), his guilty plea, his remorse, and his efforts to abstain from alcohol. The court found that a substantial fine, greater than that imposed by the Learned Chief Magistrate, with a Good Behaviour Order would be adequate. The court also decided that a total prohibition on the consumption of alcohol for the period of the restricted licence was severe but not beyond range, and the condition to extend that beyond the period of the restricted licence was unwarranted.

The court ordered that the appeal be allowed, the conviction entered by the Magistrates Court be confirmed, and the sentence imposed by the Magistrates Court be set aside. In lieu, Kennedy was sentenced to a fine of $1,000.00, ordered to pay court costs of $63.00 and a Criminal Injuries Compensation and Victims Levy of $60.00, required to sign an undertaking to comply with the Offender’s Good Behaviour Obligations under the Crimes (Sentence Administration) Act 2005 (ACT) for a period of 12 months, and his period of disqualification from holding or obtaining a licence be reduced to eight months and three days from the date of the judgment.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

  • Appeal

  • Limitation Periods

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Irving v Head [2016] ACTSC 37

Cases Citing This Decision

20

Damon Hoyer v Luke Burow [2014] ACTMC 2
Atmore v Milner [2016] ACTSC 260
Atmore v Milner [2016] ACTSC 260
Cases Cited

22

Statutory Material Cited

0

Barac v Thexton [2008] ACTSC 137
Shero v Hinton [2010] ACTSC 73
Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25