Kennedy v Complete Belting Solutions Pty Ltd

[2013] FWC 2777

[2013] FWC 2777

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal

Romy Kennedy
v
Complete Belting Solutions Pty Ltd
(U2013/6174)

COMMISSIONER JONES MELBOURNE, 9 MAY 2013

Application Dismissed Pursuant to s.587 on Own Motion.

[1] On 5 February 2013, an application pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a remedy for unfair dismissal was lodged by Ms Romy Kennedy (the Applicant).

[2] The Form 2 - Application for Relief from Unfair Dismissal (the Application) filed by the Applicant notes her dismissal took effect on 5 February 2013.

[3] On 12 February 2013, correspondence was sent to the Applicant pointing out that on the basis of the information contained in the Form 2, the Application was lodged on the day of termination and thus appeared to be made prematurely. The correspondence required the Applicant to advise the Commission in 14 days whether she wished to proceed with her Application.

[4] On 21 March 2013, further correspondence was sent to the Applicant requiring her to advise the Commission within 14 days whether she wished to proceed with her Application. To date no response has been received.

[5] Subsection 394(1) of the Act provides that a person who has been dismissed may apply for an unfair dismissal remedy. Subsection 394(2) provides that an application must be made within 21 days after the dismissal took effect. S.36(1) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) deals with the calculation of time. Item 6 provides that where the period is expressed to begin after a specified day, the time period does not include that day. Consequently, an application must be made within a time period, after the dismissal took effect.

[6] Section 587 of the Act provides:

587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

Note: For another power of the FWC to dismiss an application for a remedy for unfair dismissal made under Division 5 of Part 3-2, see section 399A.

(2) Despite paragraphs (1)(b) and (c), the FWC must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:

(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or

(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.

(3) The FWC may dismiss an application:

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application.

[7] I am satisfied that, in determining whether to dismiss a matter on its own initiative, the Commission is not limited to matters specified in s.587(1)(a) to (c). The opening words ‘Without limiting when FWC may dismiss a matter’, clearly confers a broader discretion.

[8] In the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied the Application was made prematurely and that the Application was invalid.

[9] Consequently, I have decided to dismiss the application pursuant to s.587 of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR536302>