Kendling and Kendling

Case [2008] FamCA 31


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KENDLING & KENDLING AND ORS [2008] FamCA 31
FAMILY LAW – COSTS - Between parties
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Marriage of Poletti (unreported, 2 March 1990)
APPLICANT: Mrs Kendling
RESPONDENT: Mr Kendling
SECOND RESPONDENT T Pty Ltd
THIRD RESPONDENT Jeremy Kendling
FOURTH RESPONDENT Penelope Kendling
FIFTH RESPONDENT L Pty Ltd
SIXTH RESPONDENT A Pty Ltd
SEVENTH RESPONDENT Mr Z
EIGHTH RESPONDENT B Ltd
NINTH RESPONDENT I Pty Ltd
TENTH RESPONDENT Mr PS
FILE NUMBER: SYF 2903 of 2003
DATE DELIVERED: 25 January 2008
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Justice O'Ryan
HEARING DATE: 14 December 2007

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Richardson
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Michael Conley Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Baron
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Dorrough Smart Solicitors

Orders

  1. By 4.00 pm on 29 February 2008 the Husband pay into the trust account of the Wife’s Solicitors, Messrs Michael Conley Solicitors, the sum of $1,000,000.

  2. The determination as to whether the sum referred to in Order 1 hereof be treated as part of the Wife’s entitlement to property settlement, the provision of maintenance for the Wife, or in payment by the Husband of the costs of and incidental to these proceedings, be reserved to the trial judge at the final hearing of these proceedings.

  3. Any monies received by or on behalf of the Wife pursuant to Order 1 hereof be utilised on account of the Wife’s costs in prosecuting her claims in these proceedings, including costs (outstanding and future) in relation to solicitors, counsel, accountants, valuers, and other legal costs and disbursements including process servers fees and conduct money.

  4. The Wife is to account at the final hearing for monies so received and disbursed

IT IS NOTED IN CONNECTION WITH THESE ORDERS that the judgment of the Honourable Justice O’Ryan delivered this day will for all publication and reporting purposes be referred to as Kendling & Kendling and Ors

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

FILE NUMBER: SYF 2903 / of 2003

Mrs Kendling

Applicant

And

T Pty Ltd

Second Respondent

And

Mr Kendling

Third Respondent

And

Penelope Kendling

Fourth Respondent

And

L Pty Ltd

Fifth Respondent

And

A Pty Ltd

Sixth Respondent

And

Mr Z

Seventh Respondent

And

B Ltd

Eighth Respondent

And

I Pty Ltd

Ninth Respondent

And

Mr Pearce

Tenth Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

  1. Before me for hearing is an application for costs filed on 30 November 2007 by Mrs Kendling, who I shall refer to as the Wife.  The Wife is seeking an amount of $1,484,650.  The Respondent is Mr Kendling who I shall refer to as the Husband. 

  2. There are pending proceedings for property settlement which were commenced by an amended Response filed by the Wife on 10 March 2006.  In an earlier judgment I set out the final orders sought by each of the Wife and the Husband.

  3. There are a number of respondents.  The Second Respondent is T Pty Ltd.  The Third Respondent is Jeremy Kendling.  The Fourth Respondent is…

Continue reading Kendling and Kendling

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kendling and Kendling [2008] FamCA 31
Case
[2008] FamCA 31
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Kendling and Kendling*, Justice O'Ryan considered an application concerning financial matters between the parties. The dispute involved the husband's obligation to pay a sum of money, with the ultimate allocation of that sum to be determined at a later stage.

The central legal issue before the court was the immediate disposition of funds pending a final determination of property settlement, maintenance, and costs. Specifically, the court had to decide whether to order the husband to pay a substantial sum and how that payment should be provisionally treated.

Justice O'Ryan ordered that the husband pay $1,000,000 into the trust account of the wife's solicitors by 4:00 pm on 29 February 2008. The court reserved the determination of whether this sum would be considered part of the property settlement, maintenance for the wife, or payment of costs to the trial judge at the final hearing. Crucially, any monies received by the wife were to be utilised on account of her costs in prosecuting her claims, including solicitor, counsel, accountant, valuer, and other legal costs and disbursements. The wife was required to account for these monies at the final hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

By 4.00 pm on 29 February 2008 the Husband pay into the trust account of the Wife’s Solicitors, Messrs Michael Conley Solicitors, the sum of $1,000,000.

2.

The determination as to whether the sum referred to in Order 1 hereof be treated as part of the Wife’s entitlement to property settlement, the provision of maintenance for the Wife, or in payment by the Husband of the costs of and incidental to these proceedings, be reserved to the trial judge at the final hearing of these proceedings.

3.

Any monies received by or on behalf of the Wife pursuant to Order 1 hereof be utilised on account of the Wife’s costs in prosecuting her claims in these proceedings, including costs (outstanding and future) in relation to solicitors, counsel, accountants, valuers, and other legal costs and disbursements including process servers fees and conduct money.

4.

The Wife is to account at the final hearing for monies so received and disbursed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.