Dust Diseases Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kelsall v Downer EDI Mining Pty Ltd & Ors [2025] NSWDDT 2 Hearing dates: 23 May 2025 Date of orders: 3 June 2025 Decision date: 03 June 2025 Before: Judge Russell SC Decision: See pars [33] and [66] below
Catchwords: DUST DISEASES – notice of motion for dismissal – amended pleadings went beyond the bounds of order for amendment – order must be understood in the context in which it was made – failure to comply with a requirement of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – an irregularity – proceedings not invalidated
DUST DISEASES – notice of motion for discovery – only documents relating to a matter in issue are discoverable – examination of the pleadings to ascertain matters in issue – interests of justice – scope of discovery can be limited – cost and delay is to be considered – no evidence as to cost concerning discovery – documents relate to matters in issue
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 58, 61, 63, 64
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 14.28, 21.1, 21.2, 21.4. 21.8, 35.3
Dust Diseases Tribunal Rules 2019 (NSW), r 4
Cases Cited: Alexander v Fitzpatrick [1981] Qd R 359
Birmingham v London [1913] 3 KB 850
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Goater [2016] NWSC 710
Hunter New England Local Health District v Munters Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 788
Mulley v Manifold [1959] HCA 23; (1959) 103 CLR 341
Palavi v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 264
Percy v General Motors-Holden’s Pty Ltd [1975] 1 NSWLR 289
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: David James Kelsall (Plaintiff)
Downer EDI Mining Pty Ltd (First Defendant)
Daracon Pty Ltd (Second Defendant)
Tarrawonga Coal Pty Ltd (Third Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
S Tzouganatos and V Boutas (Plaintiff)
J Sharpe (First Defendant)
T Rowles (Second Defendant – in the interests of Coal Mines Insurance Ltd for liability as employer in a NSW coal mine)
J Tryon (Second Defendant – in the interests of Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer for liability as a non-coal mine employer)
D Andersen solicitor (Second Defendant – for liability other than as an employer)
K McMeniman solicitor (Third Defendant)
Vbr Lawyers (Plaintiff)
Meridian Lawyers (First Defendant)
Sparke Helmore (Second Defendant – in the interests of Coal Mines Insurance Ltd for liability as employer in a NSW coal mine)
Rankin Ellison (Second Defendant – in the interests of Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer for liability as a non-coal mine employer)
HWL Ebsworth (Second Defendant – for liability other than as an employer)
McCabes Lawyers (Third Defendant)
File Number(s): 2023/00451985
JUDGMENT
Introduction
-
This judgment concerns two Notices of Motion:
A Notice of Motion filed on 6 May 2025 by the plaintiff Mr David Kelsall seeking verified discovery from all three defendants (the Discovery Motion).
An Amended Notice of Motion filed on 20 May 2025 by Mr Andersen solicitor seeking orders that Mr Kelsall’s pleadings against his client be set aside or dismissed or struck out…
Continue reading Kelsall v Downer EDI Mining Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kelsall v Downer EDI Mining Pty Ltd [2025] NSWDDT 2
- Case
- [2025] NSWDDT 2
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court determined that the plaintiff's amended pleadings exceeded the scope of the earlier order, but this did not invalidate the proceedings as it was not a fundamental irregularity. The court also assessed the scope of discoverable documents, ruling that only those relating to the matters in issue were discoverable. The court considered the interests of justice, the potential for cost and delay, and concluded that the plaintiff had not provided evidence of the cost concerning the discovery.
The court ordered that the amended pleadings would be allowed, despite exceeding the scope of the earlier order. Additionally, the scope of discovery was limited to documents relating to the matters in issue. The final orders are detailed in paragraphs [33] and [66] of the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
See pars [33] and [66] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.