NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CITATION: KELLY v ROADS & TRAFFIC AUTHORITY [2000] NSWCA 292
FILE NUMBER(S):
40643/99
HEARING DATE(S): 5 October 2000
JUDGMENT DATE: 05/10/2000
PARTIES:
TERENCE JAMES KELLY v ROADS & TRAFFIC AUTHORITY
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P Giles JA Davies AJA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Compensation Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): CC 6368/96
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Maguire J
COUNSEL:
Appellant: M L Brabazon; J K Kinross
Respondent: P M Hall QC; L V Gyles; J Connors
SOLICITORS:
Appellant: Emery Partners
Respondent: Hunt & Hunt
CATCHWORDS:
Workplace injury - appellant argues contraction of pneumonia in workplace - consideration of evidence from microbiologist - not proven that virus contracted in workplace sewerage water - microbiologists’s evidence only a possibility - ND.
LEGISLATION CITED:
DECISION:
Appeal dismissed with costs
JUDGMENT:
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40643/99
CC 6368/96
MASON P
GILES JA
DAVIES AJAThursday 5 October 2000
Terrence James KELLY v ROADS & TRAFFIC AUTHORITY
JUDGMENT
MASON P: The appellant failed in his application for worker’s compensation for incapacity stemming from contracting an unusual strain of pneumonia called Chlamydia Pneumoniae. There was an award for the respondent employer which is now challenged “in point of law” (Compensation Court Act 1984 s32).
The debilitating illness was diagnosed in September 1995.
The issue fought and lost at trial was whether that injury arose out of or in the course of the appellant’s employment with the respondent.
In his Application for Determination, the appellant pleaded that the injury happened through exposure to infection-inducing agents while working as a driver for the Roads & Traffic Authority at the F3 extension Minmi Swamp Stockrington. The date of injury was pleaded as July to September 1995.
In fact the appellant worked at the site between 17 and 21 July 1995. He used a tip truck to haul crushed slag and sand. He said that he was splashed with grey water which smelled strongly of sewage and at times he drove through a mist containing traces of such water.
It was found by the primary judge, Judge Maguire, that a week or so after starting at the Minmi job the appellant became ill with symptoms of fever, chills and a lung infection: but this was not pneumonia.
The hearing took place on 30 March 1998, 23 June 1998 and 4 February 1999.
The case initially advanced by the appellant and maintained during the first two hearing days was that the grey water at Minmi was the source of the Chlamydia bacteria which led to the pneumonia detected in September 1995. This case failed when it became apparent that the incubation period for Chlamydia infection detected in September was too long to be consistent with the onset of the symptoms revealed back in July. The appellant accepts this. Indeed the appellant appears to have accepted the inevitability of such a conclusion during the hearing because the case left to the court at the conclusion of the hearing on 4 February…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kelly v Roads & Traffic Authority and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2000] NSWCA 292
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the appellant had proven, on the balance of probabilities, that the pneumonia contracted was a result of exposure to sewerage water in the workplace. This required the court to assess the scientific evidence presented, particularly that of a microbiologist.
The court found that the evidence from the microbiologist, while suggesting a possibility of the virus being contracted in the workplace sewerage water, did not establish this as a certainty or even a probability. The evidence was considered insufficient to discharge the onus of proof resting on the appellant. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal dismissed with costs
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.