Kekatos v The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales
Case
•
[1999] NSWCA 288
•26 August 1999
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Kekatos v The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [1999] NSWCA 288
[1999] NSWCA 288
26 August 1999
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appeal concerned alleged contraventions of Part 3A of the *Legal Profession Act 1987* (NSW) by the appellant, Mr. Kekatos, who was found to have held himself out as a solicitor and acted as such without holding a practising certificate. The respondent was the Council of the Law Society of New South Wales. The appeal was heard by Handley, Powell, and Giles JJA in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the findings of contravention were established, whether the trial judge's conduct, including interventions during the hearing and the reasons provided, rendered the trial unfair, and whether an inference adverse to Mr. Kekatos, as contemplated by *Jones v Dunkel*, was open to be drawn.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the contraventions were established. The Court reasoned that the trial judge's conduct did not render the trial unfair, and that the *Jones v Dunkel* inference was indeed open. The Court found no error in the trial judge's findings of fact or application of the law.
The Court of Appeal ordered that the time for filing a summons for leave to appeal be extended to 2 October 1998, granted leave to appeal, and ultimately dismissed the appeal with costs.
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the findings of contravention were established, whether the trial judge's conduct, including interventions during the hearing and the reasons provided, rendered the trial unfair, and whether an inference adverse to Mr. Kekatos, as contemplated by *Jones v Dunkel*, was open to be drawn.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the contraventions were established. The Court reasoned that the trial judge's conduct did not render the trial unfair, and that the *Jones v Dunkel* inference was indeed open. The Court found no error in the trial judge's findings of fact or application of the law.
The Court of Appeal ordered that the time for filing a summons for leave to appeal be extended to 2 October 1998, granted leave to appeal, and ultimately dismissed the appeal with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Villella v Telstra Corporation Limited [No 2] [2014] VCC 914
Cases Citing This Decision
14
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Dwyer
[2015] NSWCA 302
Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Basemount Pty Ltd
[2003] NSWCA 189
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
0
The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Davison
[2006] NSWSC 65
The Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Davison
[2006] NSWSC 65
Steinberg v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[1975] HCA 63
Cited Sections