FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Keir & Ramsay [2021] FamCA 217
File number(s): CRC 8 of 2020 Judgment of: REES J Date of judgment: 20 April 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – INJUNCTIONS – Application restraining the respondent from further producing or distributing erotic images of the applicant – Where the applicant originally consented to the filming and publication of material – Where the applicant withdrew consent after various videos had already been published online – Orders restraining the respondent from distributing any further footage.
FAMILY LAW – INTERIM FINANCIAL RELIEF – Where the applicant seeks orders for a $100,000 partial property settlement – Where the court found it could not be confidently predicted that any amount paid to the applicant could be adjusted in the substantive determination – Order refused – Where in the alternate, the applicant sought relief of $100,000 on account of lump sum maintenance and interim costs – Consideration of Salvage & Fosse [2020] FamCAFC 144 – Whether the applicant has any real prospect of obtaining justice without the order being made – Consideration of the respondent’s attitude to the litigation – Orders for the applicant to receive $50,000 to ‘level the playing field’ pursuant to the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117.
Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 117, 121
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 91Q
Cases cited: Salvage & Fosse [2020] Fam CAFC 144 Number of paragraphs: 66 Date of hearing: 16 April 2021 Place: Sydney Counsel for the Applicant: Mr O’Brien Solicitor for the Applicant: J Lawyers Counsel for the Respondent: Ms Spain Solicitor for the Respondent: K Lawyers ORDERS
CRC 8 of 2020 BETWEEN: MS KEIR
Applicant
AND: MR RAMSAY
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
REES J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 APRIL 2021
THE COURT NOTES the undertaking as to damages given by the applicant on 16 April 2021.
THE COURT ORDERS:
1.That the respondent is restrained from producing, editing, creating, publishing, releasing, re-releasing, distributing or disseminating by any means any material in any medium, containing any video, picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant and from causing or permitting any other person to do so.
2.That the respondent is restrained from providing any link to any material containing any video, picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant to any other person.
3.That the respondent is restrained from entering or submitting any material containing images of the applicant in any competition, festival or other public event and shall do all things necessary to remove from such competition, festival or event any images that have been submitted by him or on his behalf.
4.That the respondent, within 14 days, provide to the applicant’s solicitors:
(a)A list of all entities including partnerships that the respondent has authorised or utilised to produce, edit, create and/or distribute any material that contains any video, picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant.
(b)A list of all distributors both nationally and internationally who have distributed or been engaged to distribute material that contains any picture, image, representation…
Continue reading Keir & Ramsay
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Keir & Ramsay [2021] FamCA 217
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 217
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from further producing, distributing, or disseminating any material containing images or audio of the applicant, and to order the respondent to provide disclosure of entities involved in distribution, agreements, and financial receipts related to the material. Additionally, the court had to consider the applicant's claim for interim financial relief, specifically a $100,000 partial property settlement, and alternatively, relief of $100,000 on account of lump sum maintenance and interim costs, assessing whether the applicant had a real prospect of obtaining justice without such an order.
Rees J granted extensive injunctive relief, restraining the respondent from producing, editing, publishing, releasing, distributing, or disseminating any material containing images or audio of the applicant, and from providing links to such material. The court also ordered the respondent to remove any submitted images from competitions or events and to provide detailed disclosure regarding entities involved in production and distribution, agreements, financial receipts, and all original footage and copies. Regarding financial relief, the court refused the application for a $100,000 partial property settlement, finding it could not be confidently predicted that any such payment could be adjusted in the substantive determination. However, the court ordered the respondent to pay $50,000 to the applicant from funds held in trust from a property sale, pursuant to s 117 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), to "level the playing field" and ensure the applicant had a real prospect of obtaining justice. The court also directed parties to file submissions regarding costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
CRC 8 of 2020
BETWEEN:
MS KEIR
Applicant
AND:
MR RAMSAY
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
REES J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 APRIL 2021
THE COURT NOTES the undertaking as to damages given by the applicant on 16 April 2021.
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. That the respondent is restrained from producing, editing, creating, publishing, releasing, re-releasing, distributing or disseminating by any means any material in any medium, containing any video, picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant and from causing or permitting any other person to do so.
2. That the respondent is restrained from providing any link to any material containing any video, picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant to any other person.
3. That the respondent is restrained from entering or submitting any material containing images of the applicant in any competition, festival or other public event and shall do all things necessary to remove from such competition, festival or event any images that have been submitted by him or on his behalf.
4. That the respondent, within 14 days, provide to the applicant’s solicitors:
(a) A list of all entities including partnerships that the respondent has authorised or utilised to produce, edit, create and/or distribute any material that contains any video, picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant.
(b) A list of all distributors both nationally and internationally who have distributed or been engaged to distribute material that contains any picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant.
(c) A copy of any agreement between the respondent and any entity that he has utilised for the purpose of distribution and any distributor or publisher of any material that contains any picture, image, representation or audio of the applicant.
5. That, within 14 days, the respondent deliver to the applicant’s solicitor all original footage and any copies in his possession or control containing any video, picture, image or audio of the applicant.
6. That the respondent, within 14 days, provide to the applicant’s solicitors disclosure of the amounts received by him, or any entity in which he has an interest, of any money, including bitcoin and cryptocurrency, received since June 2019 in relation to the publication of any [redacted] product or image.
7. That each of the applicant and the respondent do all things required to instruct H Lawyers to pay to the applicant’s solicitors the sum of $50,000 from the funds held in trust on behalf of the respondent from the sale of the property at Suburb C, such payment being a payment pursuant to s 117 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
8. That each party file and serve any written submissions in relation to the applicant’s application for an order that the respondent pay the costs of this application not later than 4pm on 4 May 2021.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.