Keelan v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District

Case

[2016] NSWSC 469

08 April 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Keelan v South Eastern Sydney Local Health District [2016] NSWSC 469
Hearing dates:8 April 2016
Date of orders: 08 April 2016
Decision date: 08 April 2016
Jurisdiction:Common Law
Before: Wilson J
Decision:

1. The hearing of this matter is to be expedited.
2. The defendant to request further and better particulars by 15 April 2016.
3. Plaintiff to answer particulars by 22 April 2016.
4. Defendant is to file defence by 29 April 2016.
5. The plaintiff is to serve an expert report as required by r 31.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) by 17 June 2016.
6. Plaintiff is to complete service of expert reports as to quantum by 17 June 2016.
7. Defendant is to complete service of expert reports by 12 August 2016.
8. Matter listed for directions on 17 August 2016.
9. Matter listed for hearing of the Statement of Claim on 6 September 2016 with a four day estimate.
10. Liberty is granted to the parties to restore the matter to the list on 3 days’ notice.
11. Proceedings referred for court-appointed mediation. Mediation to take place by 26 August 2016.
12. Leave is granted to the parties to jointly approach the Registrar for the purpose of fixing a date for mediation.

Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice of motion for expedition of proceedings – medical and nursing care of 93 year old – Notice of Motion with consent of both parties
Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Eileen Teresa Keelan (Plaintiff)
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr J Mrsic (Plaintiff)
Mr A McCarthy (Defendant)

  Solicitors:
T D Kelly & Co (Plaintiff)
Crown Solicitor’s Office (Defendant)
File Number(s):2016/00056149
Publication restriction:None

Judgment

  1. Before the Court is a Notice of Motion filed on 24 February 2016 in the Registry of this Court. The Motion that I am asked to determine seeks expedition of the hearing of a Statement of Claim filed by the plaintiff. The Statement of Claim relates to the medical and nursing care provided to a 93 year old lady.

  2. The expedition is required because the determination of a Statement of Claim is necessary to ensure that adequate and appropriate care can be provided to the patient.    Both parties agree that expedition is appropriate, having regard to the age of the patient, and more particularly, to some specific injuries which she sustained in February of 2015.

  3. There is an issue as to whether the defendant is responsible for those injuries, owing to its negligence. That is an issue that will need to be determined with some speed in all of the circumstances.

  4. Accordingly, and noting the consent of the defendant, I make the orders sought in the Notice of Motion, that is, that the hearing of this matter is to be dealt with with expedition.

ORDERS

  1. I make the following orders:

  1. The hearing of this matter is to be expedited.

  2. The defendant to request further and better particulars by 15 April 2016.

  3. Plaintiff to answer particulars by 22 April 2016.

  4. Defendant is to file defence by 29 April 2016.

  5. The plaintiff is to serve an expert report as required by r 31.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) by 17 June 2016.

  6. Plaintiff is to complete service of expert reports as to quantum by 17 June 2016.

  7. Defendant is to complete service of expert reports by 12 August 2016.

  8. Matter listed for directions on 17 August 2016.

  9. Matter listed for hearing of the Statement of Claim on 6 September 2016 with a four day estimate.

  10. Liberty is granted to the parties to restore the matter to the list on 3 days’ notice.

  11. Proceedings referred for court-appointed mediation. Mediation to take place by 26 August 2016.

  12. Leave is granted to the parties to jointly approach the Registrar for the purpose of fixing a date for mediation.

**********

Decision last updated: 19 April 2016

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0