Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kearney v Grow Choice Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 325 Hearing dates: 13 December 2023 Date of orders: 21 December 2023 Decision date: 21 December 2023 Before: Meagher JA at [1];
Mitchelmore JA at [2];
Basten AJA at [3]Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the judgment and orders in the District Court of 2 June 2023.
(2) Grant leave to the appellant to file and rely on the amended notice of appeal annexed to the notice of motion dated 12 December 2023, and direct the appellant to file the amended notice of appeal by 12 January 2024.
(3) Allow the appeal and –
(a) set aside so much of order (1) made in the District Court as gave judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant;
(b) set aside order (4) with respect to the liability of the second defendant for the costs of the first defendant; and to the extent that it covered the plaintiff’s claim with respect to the second defendant;
(c) dismiss the amended statement of claim in so far as it claimed relief against the second defendant.
(4) If either party seeks costs of the trial, it may do so by a motion filed by 2 February 2024.
(5) Order that the respondent pay the applicant/appellant’s costs in this Court.
Catchwords: APPEAL – application for leave – amount under threshold – whether challenge more than merely arguable – applying arguability criterion on a concurrent hearing – application by party not bearing onus of proof – no challenge to findings of primary fact
GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITY – contract of guarantee – oral undertaking by principal of debtor company – repeated undertakings – contractual intention – implied contingent agreement – consideration – forbearance – continuing to trade
Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), s 127
Cases Cited: Edlin v Williams [1998] QCA 439; [2000] ANZ Conv R 43
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Peter Kearney (Applicant)
Grow Choice Pty Ltd (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
J Mack (Applicant)
A E Hopkins (Respondent)
Jarratt Webb & Barrett (Applicant)
Rural Law (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/208516 Publication restriction: N/A Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- District Court
- Jurisdiction:
- Civil
- Date of Decision:
- 2 June 2023
- Before:
- SJ Gibb DCJ
- File Number(s):
- 2021/283955
HEADNOTE
[This headnote is not to be read as part of the judgment]
The applicant, Simon Peter Kearney, was the principal of North West Direct Sales Pty Ltd (North West), a retailer of agricultural chemicals in Tamworth. The respondent, Grow Choice Pty Ltd, was a wholesale supplier of agricultural chemicals. In January 2015, Grow Choice entered into an agreement with North West, whereby the latter would store agricultural products provided by Grow Choice. The products would either be on-sold by Grow Choice or by North West. Grow Choice was to pay a handling fee and North West would account to Grow…
Continue reading Kearney v Grow Choice Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kearney v Grow Choice Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 325
- Case
- [2023] NSWCA 325
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether Kearney had provided a legally binding oral guarantee, and if so, whether there was sufficient consideration for that guarantee. Specifically, the court had to determine if Kearney's repeated oral assurances to Grow Choice, made in his capacity as principal of the debtor company, constituted a contractual intention to be bound, and whether Grow Choice's continued trading with the company amounted to valid consideration for the alleged guarantee. The court was not required to challenge the primary findings of fact made by the District Court.
The Court of Appeal reasoned that while the initial undertakings might not have been immediately binding, the repeated assurances, coupled with Grow Choice's forbearance from ceasing to trade with the company in reliance on those assurances, could establish an implied contingent agreement. This implied agreement, supported by the consideration of forbearance, meant that Kearney was bound by his oral guarantee. Consequently, the court granted leave to appeal, allowed the appeal, and set aside the District Court's judgment against Kearney, dismissing the claim against him. The court also ordered that Grow Choice pay Kearney's costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the judgment and orders in the District Court of 2 June 2023.
(2) Grant leave to the appellant to file and rely on the amended notice of appeal annexed to the notice of motion dated 12 December 2023, and direct the appellant to file the amended notice of appeal by 12 January 2024.
(3) Allow the appeal and –
(a) set aside so much of order (1) made in the District Court as gave judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant;
(b) set aside order (4) with respect to the liability of the second defendant for the costs of the first defendant; and to the extent that it covered the plaintiff’s claim with respect to the second defendant;
(c) dismiss the amended statement of claim in so far as it claimed relief against the second defendant.
(4) If either party seeks costs of the trial, it may do so by a motion filed by 2 February 2024.
(5) Order that the respondent pay the applicant/appellant’s costs in this Court.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.