Kavlana Pty Limited v Campbelltown City Council

Case [2019] NSWLEC 1607


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Kavlana Pty Limited v Campbelltown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1607
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 8 November 2019
Date of orders: 05 December 2019
Decision date: 05 December 2019
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon SC
Decision:

The Court orders:
(1)   The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the documents and plans referred to in Condition 1 of ‘Annexure 1’.
(2) The applicant’s written objection by Rhodes Haskew Associates, pursuant to clause 6 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 – Development Standards (SEPP 1) in relation to the non-compliance with the minimum site area development standard set out in clause 7(4) of Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan No. 1 has been considered and I have formed the necessary opinion of satisfaction under clause 7 of SEPP 1. Consequently, the applicant’s written objection is well founded and upheld.
(3)   The appeal is upheld.
(4)   Development Application 466/2014/DA-S for the subdivision of land legally known as Lot A, DP 449151, commonly known as 15 Aberfoyle Road, Wedderburn into two Torrens title allotments is approved subject to the conditions set out in ‘Annexure 1’.

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan 2015
Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan No 1
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 – Development Standards
State Environmental Planning Policy No 44 – Koala Habitat Protection
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Kavlana Pty Limited (Applicant)
Campbelltown City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
J Reid (Applicant)
K Gerathy (Solicitor) (Respondent)

  Solicitors:
Meehans Solicitors Pty Ltd (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/336789
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the Campbelltown City Council refusal of Development Application 2466/2014/DA-S (the Application) for the subdivision of 15 Aberfoyle Road, Wedderburn into two Torrens title allotments.

  2. The background facts are set out in the Council’s Statement of Facts and Contentions (SOFAC) filed with the Court on 13 December 2018.

  3. In accordance with the Court’s usual practice, a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act), was convened between the parties on 8 November 2019. I presided over the conciliation.

  4. During the conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to them. The decision involves the Court exercising the functions under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant development consent to the applicant’s amended application on a conditional basis.

  5. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision, if the decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. There are jurisdictional prerequisites that must be satisfied before this function can be exercised. In this instance, the development does not comply with the minimum site area development standard in cl 7(4) of the Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan No 1 which applies by dint of cl 1.8A of the Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan 2015. To address this, the applicant relies upon an objection to the standard under State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 – Development Standards (SEPP 1) prepared by Rhodes Haskew Associates. Based on the SEPP 1 written request I am satisfied that compliance with the standard is unreasonable or unnecessary in this case because the development, in my assessment, achieves the objectives of the clause despite the breach. In that regard, I accept that the development is consistent with the prevailing lot sizes with the locality and is thereby compatible with the existing and the desired future character of the area. I am also satisfied that the ecological, bushfire and waste water expert evidence with regard to the preservation and maintenance of the environmentally sensitive land within the site supports an approval of this application. As the SEPP 1 states, there is no evidence of Koala presence within the Open Grass/ Woodland community area located at the northern and south – western boundaries of the site. It is therefore not Koala habitat. Nonetheless, in accordance with cl 13(2) of the State Environmental Planning Policy No 44 – Koala Habitat Protection, the applicant has obtained an approved Koala Plan of Management dated March 2019 for the site.

  6. As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

  7. The Court orders:

  1. The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the documents and plans referred to in Condition 1 of ‘Annexure 1’.

  2. The applicant’s written objection by Rhodes Haskew Associates, pursuant to clause 6 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 – Development Standards (SEPP 1) in relation to the non-compliance with the minimum site area development standard set out in clause 7(4) of Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan No. 1 has been considered and I have formed the necessary opinion of satisfaction under clause 7 of SEPP 1. Consequently, the applicant’s written objection is well founded and upheld.

  3. The appeal is upheld.

  4. Development Application 466/2014/DA-S for the subdivision of land legally known as Lot A, DP 449151, commonly known as 15 Aberfoyle Road, Wedderburn into two Torrens title allotments is approved subject to the conditions set out in ‘Annexure 1’.

………………………………

S Dixon

Senior Commissioner of the Court

Annexure 1 (88.2 KB, pdf)

**********

Amendments

10 December 2019 - Correction to typographical errors at [1] and [5].

Details
AGLC
Kavlana Pty Limited v Campbelltown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1607
Case
[2019] NSWLEC 1607
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Kavlana Pty Limited v Campbelltown City Council, the applicant, Kavlana Pty Limited, sought to amend a development application to subdivide a property in Wedderburn. The Council opposed the application on several grounds, including non-compliance with local environmental planning standards. The dispute was brought before the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The primary legal issues before the court were whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the development application to include additional documents and plans, whether the applicant’s objection to the Council’s decision was valid, and whether the development application should be approved.

The court considered the legal framework governing development applications, including relevant clauses of the State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 – Development Standards and the Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan No. 1. The court found that the applicant had provided sufficient justification for amending the development application to include additional documents and plans, thereby resolving the first issue in the applicant’s favour. In considering the applicant’s objection, the court determined that it was well founded, leading to the conclusion that the Council’s decision to reject the application was flawed. Consequently, the court upheld the appeal. The court then assessed the merits of the development application and approved it subject to certain conditions detailed in the annexure to the judgment.

As a result, the court granted the applicant leave to amend the development application, upheld the applicant’s objection, and approved the development application subject to the specified conditions. The court’s decision not only provided clarity on the procedural aspects of the application but also ensured that the development adhered to the necessary planning standards.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely upon the documents and plans referred to in Condition 1 of ‘Annexure 1’.

(2) The applicant’s written objection by Rhodes Haskew Associates, pursuant to clause 6 of State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 – Development Standards (SEPP 1) in relation to the non-compliance with the minimum site area development standard set out in clause 7(4) of Campbelltown Local Environmental Plan No. 1 has been considered and I have formed the necessary opinion of satisfaction under clause 7 of SEPP 1. Consequently, the applicant’s written objection is well founded and upheld.

(3) The appeal is upheld.

(4) Development Application 466/2014/DA-S for the subdivision of land legally known as Lot A, DP 449151, commonly known as 15 Aberfoyle Road, Wedderburn into two Torrens title allotments is approved subject to the conditions set out in ‘Annexure 1’.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.