Kaur (Migration)

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

Kaur (Migration) [2019] AATA 4606 (21 October 2019)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANTS:  Ms Manmeet Kaur
Mr Paviter Puneet Singh Nijjar

CASE NUMBER:  1826093

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):           BCC2018/2804399

MEMBER:Danielle Galvin

DATE:21 October 2019

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicants Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visas.

Statement made on 21 October 2019 at 9:40am

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 29 August 2018 to refuse to grant the applicants Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

  2. The applicants applied for the visas on 26 July 2018. Visa Class VC contains Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate). The criteria for the grant of a Subclass 485 visa are set out in Part 485 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations), including criteria in different streams. In this case, the applicant is seeking to meet the criteria in the Post-Study Work stream, which includes cl.485.231 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

  3. The delegate refused to grant the visas because the first named applicant (the applicant) did not satisfy cl.485.231 because the applicant had claimed to have studied a Masters of Professional Accounting at Edith Cowan University (the University) from 22 November 2017 to 24 July 2018. However, the letter of completion provided from that University lists the completion date as 8 August 2018. Consequently the completion date was later than the application date the delegate found that the Masters degree was not completed within the period of six months ending immediately before the day the application was made and therefore the requirements of r.485.231(3) were not met. Therefore the criteria for the grant of a Temporary Graduate (Post-Study Work) visa in the Post-Study Work stream were not met by the applicant and the visa applications were refused.

  4. The Department was in receipt of the following documents:

    ·The visa ;

    ·A complete disclosure police checks;

    ·Copies of passport extracts;

    ·Marriage certificate;

    ·Secondary education results;

    ·University results from Panjab University;

    ·Certificate of achievement in English;

    ·IELTS test report form dated 31 August 2017;

    ·Medibank details;

    ·Letter dated 10 August 2018 from the University confirming that the applicant’s course was conducted in English and that the applicant had completed all requirements for the course. The letter noted that the course commenced on 27 February 2017 and was completed on 8 August 2018.The letter notes the CRICOS CODE AS 079124B, the course being L97, Master of Professional Accounting.;

    ·Applicant’s birth certificate;

    ·Academic transcript for Curtain University dated 7 February 2017;

    ·The university’s full unit history for the applicant;

    ·The University’s confirmation of enrolment for the applicant.

  5. On 4 June 2019 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant inviting them to comment on or respond to the information  that the course was completed, according to the University, on 8 August 2018. A response was required by…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kaur (Migration) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] AATA 4606
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered the application of Ms Kaur for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa, subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – Post-Study Work stream. The primary issue before the Tribunal was whether Ms Kaur met the Australian study requirement for the visa, which mandates the completion of a specified qualification within the six months immediately preceding the visa application.

The Tribunal was required to determine if Ms Kaur held a qualification specified by the Minister, awarded by a specified educational institution, and if her study for that qualification satisfied the Australian study requirement. This involved interpreting the definition of "completed" in relation to a qualification, which means meeting the academic requirements for its award, and the duration of an "academic year" as defined by legislative instruments.

The Tribunal found that Ms Kaur held a Master of Professional Accounting from Edith Cowan University, both of which were specified in the relevant ministerial instruments. The core of the dispute concerned the timing of the completion of her studies. While Ms Kaur had met the academic requirements for her degree, the formal conferral of the qualification was delayed due to a deferred examination and subsequent ratification by a Board of Examiners. The Tribunal concluded that "completion" for the purposes of the Australian study requirement refers to the satisfaction of academic requirements, not necessarily the formal conferral date. However, the specific timing of Ms Kaur's completion relative to her visa application date meant she did not satisfy the requirement that her study be completed in the six months immediately before the application was made.

Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant Ms Kaur the Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa. The Tribunal also noted that a secondary visa applicant, who was not a member of the family unit of a Subclass 485 visa holder, also did not meet the criteria for their visa application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision under review should be affirmed.CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCEClause 485.231 requires the applicant to hold a qualification or qualifications of a kind specified by the Minister, conferred or awarded by an educational institution specified by the Minister, for which the applicant’s study must have satisfied the ‘Australian study requirement’ in the 6 months immediately before the day the visa application was made. The issue in the present case is whether the applicant meets those requirements.Does the applicant hold a specified qualification? Subclause 485.231(1) requires the applicant to hold a qualification or qualifications of a kind specified by the Minister. The relevant instrument for this purpose is IMMI 13/013. In this case, the applicant holds a Masters of Professional Accounting which is a qualification specified in that instrument. Accordingly, cl.485.231(1) is met.Was the applicant’s qualification conferred or awarded by a specified educational institution? Subclause 485.231(2) requires the applicant’s qualification or qualifications to be conferred or awarded by an educational institution specified by the Minister. The relevant instrument for this purpose is IMMI13/031. In this case, the applicant’s qualification was conferred or awarded by Edith Cowan University which is an educational institution specified in that instrument. Accordingly, cl.485.231(2) is met.Does the applicant’s study for the specified qualification meet the Australian study requirement? Subclause 485.231(3) requires that the applicant’s study for the specified qualification or qualifications met the ‘Australian study requirement’ in the 6 months immediately before the day the visa application was made. Under r.1.15F(1) of the Regulations, a person satisfies the ‘Australian study requirement’ if the person satisfies the Minister that the person has completed 1 or more degrees, diplomas or trade qualifications for award by an Australian educational institution as a result of a course or courses: ·that are registered courses,·that were completed in a total of at least 16 calendar months,·that were completed as a result of a total of at least 2 academic years study,·for which all instruction was conducted in English, and·that the applicant undertook while in Australia as the holder of a visa authorising the applicant to study. ‘Degree’, ‘diploma’, ‘trade qualification’, ‘registered course’, ‘completed’ and ‘academic year’ are all defined terms (see rr.1.03, 1.15F and 2.26AC(6), and cl.485.111). ‘Completed’, in relation to a degree, diploma or trade qualification, means having met the academic requirements for its award (r.1.15F(2)). For the purposes of this case, one ‘academic year’ is at least a total of 46 weeks, being the duration of a course registered under the Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000: LIN 19/085.Did the applicant complete a degree, diploma or other trade qualification in the 6 months immediately before the application was made?

Decision

Reasons for decision

The secondary visa applicant‘s application was refused as cl.458.311 was not met as they were found not to be a member of the family unit of the holder of a Subclass 485 visa. The applicant submitted that the secondary applicant will be eligible for a visa once hers is approved. Given that the applicant has not been successful the secondary visa applicant is not a member of the family unit of a holder of a Subclass 485 visa and therefore does not meet cl.458.311.DECISION The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicants Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visas.Danielle GalvinMember

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.