Kaur (Migration)
[2020] AATA 2908
•28 April 2020
Kaur (Migration) [2020] AATA 2908 (28 April 2020)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANTS: Mrs Jaskarn Kaur
Mr Ranjit Singh
Master Pawanpreet Singh SinghCASE NUMBER: 1903997
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/5396350
MEMBER:Mark Bishop
DATE:28 April 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas.
Statement made on 28 April 2020 at 10:27am
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – genuine access to funds – non-current statements of deposit – unspecified relationship with fund owners – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cls 600.214, 600.311STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 8 February 2019 to refuse to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicants applied for the visas on 2 December 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The primary visa applicant (the applicant) applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.214 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) because the applicant failed to provide evidence of Genuine Access to Funds (GAF).
The Tribunal exercised its discretion to hold the hearing by telephone. The hearing was held during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Tribunal determined it was reasonable to hold a hearing by telephone, having regard to the nature of this matter and the individual circumstances of the applicant. The Tribunal also had regard to the Tribunal’s objective of providing a mechanism of review that is fair, just, economical and quick, and the delay to the matter if the hearing was not to be conducted by telephone. The applicant did not raise any concerns as to conducting the review hearing by phone. The Tribunal is satisfied that the applicant was given a fair opportunity to give evidence and present arguments.
The applicant was represented in her review hearing by her registered Migration Agent (MA).
The applicant provided a copy of the decision record to the Tribunal.
The date of decision was 8 February 2019.
The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 28 April 2020 to give evidence and present arguments.
For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the decision under review should be affirmed.
Genuine access to funds (cl.500.214)
The criteria for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are set out in Part 500 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations. The primary criteria in cl.500.211 to cl.500.218 must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need only satisfy the secondary criteria. The issue in the present case is GAF.
Clause 500.214 requires the applicant to meet certain financial requirements. If the applicant is required to do so by the Minister, they must give evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements set out in an instrument: cl.500.214(3). All primary applicants must also satisfy the Tribunal that, while they hold the visa, sufficient funds will be available to meet their costs and expenses during their intended stay in Australia, as well as the costs and expenses of any members of their family unit who will be in Australia: cl.500.214(2). The Tribunal must also be satisfied that the applicant will have genuine access to the relevant kinds of funds.
In the present case, the Minister has required the applicant to give evidence of financial capacity in accordance with cl.500.214(3).
Has the applicant provided evidence of financial capacity in accordance with the instrument?
The requirements for evidence of financial capacity for cl.500.214(3) are set out in LIN 19/198, which is attached to this decision.
An applicant is required to provide current information to the Tribunal to satisfy GAF as set out in cl.500.214.
On 21 February 2019 the applicant provided copies of the following documents to the Tribunal;
1.Various statements of deposit in the name of Darshan Singh as at 12 February 2019;
2.Affidavit in the name of Darshan Singh dated 13 February 2019 that declared as follows:
·He is the permanent resident of Village Kotha Guru Tehsil Rampura Phul, District Bathinda Punjab, India;
·Miss Jaskarn Kaul is his real daughter presently residing in Australia;
3.Various statements of term deposit (3) in the name of Ranjeet Singh R/o V-Kalyan sadda PO Kalyan sukha Teh Nathana Bathinda dated 14 February 2019. These term deposits appear to be for 8 years maturing on 11 February 2021 with a principal value of INR 385000 (as at time of decision approximately AUD$7,884.80) and accrued interest of INR 243017.78 (as at time of decision approximately AUD$4,977.00);
4.Various balance confirmation certificates in the name of Ranjit Singh S/O Sh. Dharam Pal Vpo Kalyan Sukha Tehsil Nathana District:- Bathinda, India dated 14 February 2019. These confirmations of deposit certificates were written in Indian script and the applicant failed to provide a copy of the confirmation of deposit certificates in translation. The applicant failed to comply with the Tribunal request of 9 April 2020 that “Any documents or written arguments sent to us should be in English or accompanied by a translation from a qualified translator”. The applicant did provide a balance confirmation letter from the Punjab National Bank dated 14 February 2019 that certified Mr Ranjit Singh held 3 deposits in aggregate amounting to INR 9,82,445 (as at date of decision approximately AUD$20,120.47). These confirmations of deposit certificates appeared to be term deposits of 5 years with date of maturity 4 March 2018.
The various statements of deposit summarised in paragraph 15(1) were for a period of one year above and appear to mature on 12 February 2019. They are not current. The Tribunal gives them no weight.
The affidavit summarised in paragraph 15(2) above does not contain a statement of support and does not state the applicant has genuine access to funds. The Tribunal gives it no weight.
The various statements of deposit summarised in paragraph 15(3) and 15(4) above are not accompanied by any statement of support or genuine access to funds. The applicant did not advise the Tribunal as to the identity of Ranjeet Singh or Ranjit Singh or her relationship with either person. As the statements of deposit in the name of Ranjeet Singh (as summarised in paragraph 15(3) above) are not accompanied by a statement of support or a statement of genuine access to funds the Tribunal can give them no weight. As the balance confirmation of deposit certificates in the name of Ranjit Singh (as summarised in paragraph 15(4) above) appear to expire on 4 March 2018 the Tribunal gives them no weight. As the balance of confirmation letter from the Punjab National Bank is dated 14 February 2019 and is not current the Tribunal gives it no weight.
In evidence the applicant advised the Tribunal she had been resident in Australia since 2009. She last engaged in study in July 2014. From July 2014 until June 2018 she resided in Australia as the holder of a 457 visa. In that period of four years she worked as a hairdresser. After July 2018 she lost her job and had only limited casual work. She had not worked since April 2019 in Australia. She was now pregnant. Her husband worked full time in a factory and supported the family. She did not provide detail as to any remittances from her home country. The applicant provided copies of Graduation Certificates and transcript in Hairdressing at Certificate III and IV level and Salon Management at Diploma level from 2009 until 2011 and Business at Certificate IV and Diploma level in 2012. In evidence to the Tribunal the applicant advised she resided in Australia from 20 December 2018 as the holder of a Bridging Visa E. She advised she did not have study rights and had not had study rights since December 2018.
On 21 February 2019 the applicant provided a copy of a COE (Number A274D825) in a Diploma of Leadership and Management created 28 November 2018 commencing 18 February 2019 and concluding 16 February 2020. Outstanding tuition fees of $5,000 were shown on the COE.
In evidence the applicant advised the Tribunal she never commenced study in this Diplomas as she did not hold study rights
As this COE has expired the Tribunal gives this COE no weight.
On 9 April 2020 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and invited the applicant to attend a hearing. The Tribunal advised the applicant “…Please provide all documents you intend to rely on to establish that you meet the criteria for the visa. The decision made by the department to refuse to grant a visa should set out the reasons why you did not meet the criteria, and you should have regard to these and any changes in your circumstances, in providing documents and preparing for the hearing. Any documents or written arguments sent to us should be in English or accompanied by a translation from a qualified translator”.
The Tribunal requested the applicant provide the following documents at least 7 days prior to the hearing:
1.A copy of your current Confirmation of Enrolment (COE) or other document/s that show you are currently enrolled in a course of study as defined in cl 500.111 and as required by cl 500.211(a) of schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) for the grant of the visa.
2.Documents that show your past studies in Australia, including copies of all your attendance certificates, academic transcripts and certificates of completion as well as documents evidencing any work related to your past or intended studies in Australia.
3.Either:
·Documents that demonstrate you have genuine access to sufficient funds to meet your costs and expenses during your intended stay in Australia as well as the costs and expenses of each member of your family unit (if any) who will be in Australia, to pay course fees, living costs, school costs (where relevant), and travel costs over the relevant period. You must also provide evidence that the funds are of a kind specified in the relevant legislative instrument.
OR·Evidence of the annual income of your parents/spouse/de facto partner and that you have genuine access to those funds. Please note: any access to funds information that is from outside of Australia needs to be converted into Australian Dollars (AUD) using the following link: A copy of the conversion needs to be added to any submission with the conversion date.
In addition on 9 April 2020 the Tribunal provided a copy of LIN 19/198 Financial Capacity Instrument to the applicant. This instrument in s.6 (2) outlines the detail an applicant is required to provide to comply with the instrument and hence satisfy cl.500.214 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations. The Tribunal is of the view the applicant was provided with adequate written notice of the type of information required to be provided to the Tribunal to satisfy LIN 19/198.
On 17 April 2020 the applicant provided copies of the following documents to the Tribunal:
1.Submission stating GAF amounted to AUD$48,751 plus method of calculation;
2.Evidence of term deposits said to amount to AUD$57,197 as outlined immediately below:
1)Letter from Punjab National Bank headed Balance Confirmation Certificate dated 14 February 2019 in the name of Mr Ranjit Singh showing aggregate deposits in three accounts of INR 9,82,445 (as at date of decision approximately AUD$20,120.47) and accompanying Confirmation of Deposit Certificates. These documents were previously provided to the Tribunal on 21 February 2019 and are summarised at paragraph 15(4) above. For the reasons outlined in paragraph 18 above the Tribunal gives them no weight;
2)Letter from State Bank of India and accompanying term deposit advice notices dated 14 February 2019 in the name of Mr Ranjeet Singh showing term deposits that appear to be for 8 years maturing on 11 February 2021 with a principal value of INR 385000 (as at time of decision approximately AUD$7,884.80) and accrued interest of INR 243017.78 (as at time of decision approximately AUD$4,977.00). These documents were previously provided to the Tribunal on 21 February 2019 and are summarised at paragraph 15(3) above. For the reasons outlined in paragraph 18 above the Tribunal gives them no weight;
3)Confirmation of Deposit Certificate in the name of Darshan Singh Dhillon issued by the Punjab National Bank showing a one year deposit (inclusive of interest) of INR 5,37,511 maturing on 3 July 2020 (as at time of decision approximately AUD$10,959.85) As this Confirmation of Deposit Certificate is current the Tribunal gives it weight.
3.Conversion calculation as at 16 April 2020;
4.Letter of Offer dated 16 April 2020 to the applicant from Orange International College for enrolment in a Diploma of Leadership and Management commencing 1 June 2020 and concluding 6 June 2021. Tuition fees of $6,000 were set out in the letter of offer. A fee plan was detailed that set out 10 instalments of $590 due on the 10th day of each month;
5.COE in a Diploma of Leadership and Management created 22 April 2020 commencing 8 June 2020 and concluding 8 June 2021. Tuition fees of $6,000 were outstanding.
The documents outlined in paragraph 26 above were not accompanied by any statement of support or statement of genuine access to funds.
The applicant was required to provide evidence of GAF amounting to $48,751.
The applicant has provided evidence of GAF amounting to $10,959.85. The applicant has not provided a current statement of support or statement of genuine access to funds.
The applicant has not provided evidence of GAF amounting to $48,751
The applicant did not provide current proof of GAF to the Tribunal. There is insufficient evidence before the Tribunal that the applicant satisfies LIN 19/198 (see paragraph 22 above in addition).
Secondary Applicants
The secondary applicants are members of the family unit of the applicant. The secondary applicants are not the members of the family unit of a person holds a Student visa and hence do not meet the requirements of cl.500.311 of the Migration Regulations.
On the basis of the above, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.214(3).
Accordingly, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.214.
Given the above findings, the Tribunal finds that the criteria for the grant of a Subclass 500 (Student) visa are not met. The applicant does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa. Accordingly, the decision under review must be affirmed.
DECISION
The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas.
Mark Bishop
MemberAttachment – LIN 19/198 – Financial capacity instrument (extract)
6 Subclause 500 (Student) visa—primary applicants
(1)For the purposes of subclause 500.214(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a primary applicant must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsections (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).
Note: For primary applicant, see section 4 of Part 1 to this instrument.
(2)The evidence of financial capacity
(a)is in the form specified in section 10; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet the following costs and expenses of the primary applicant:
(i) travel expenses; and
(ii) the following living costs and expenses:
(A)if the primary applicant intends to stay in Australia for a period of 12 months or more – AUD21,041 (annual living costs); and
(B)if the primary applicant intends to stay in Australia for a period of less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual living costs, calculated as specified in section 11; and
(iii) the following course fees, minus any amount already paid:
(A)if the duration, or the remainder, of the primary applicant’s period of study in Australia is less than 12 months – the fees for the course of study or the remaining components of the course of study; or
(B)If the duration, or the remainder, of the primary applicant’s period of study in Australia is more than 12 months – course fees for the first 12 months of the period study in Australia; and
Note : The period of study is the period beginning at one of the following commencement periods and ending on the final day of the applicant’s final course of study:
(a)if the applicant’s first course of study commenced after the date of application – on the first day of the first course of study; or
(b)if the applicant’s first course of study commenced before the date of application – on the date of application.
(c)demonstrates that the primary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet the following costs and expenses of each secondary applicant making a combined application with the primary applicant:
(i) travel expenses; and
(ii) for each secondary applicant who intends to stay in Australia for a period of 12 months or more – the following costs (annual living costs):
(A)for a spouse or de facto partner - AUD7,362 and
(B)for a dependent child - AUD3,152; and
(iii) for each secondary applicant who intends to stay in Australia for a period of less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual living costs, calculated as specified in section 11; and
(iv) the following school fees for each school-age dependant:
(A)if the school-age dependant intends to stay in Australia for more than 12 months - AUD8,296 (annual school costs); or
(B)if the school-age dependant intends to stay in Australia for less than 12 months – the pro rata equivalent of annual school costs, calculated as specified in section 11; or
(C)if the school-age dependant is enrolled in a course of study at a State or Territory government school where the fees have been waived, and the Primary Applicant is enrolled in a course as a doctoral degree student, a Foreign Affairs student, a Defence student or a Commonwealth sponsored student – nil.
Note: For secondary applicant, see section 4 of Part 1 to this instrument
(3)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary applicant’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income, in the 12 months immediately before the application is made, that is:
(i)if there is no secondary applicant– at least AUD62,222; or
(ii)if there is a secondary applicant – at least AUD72,592.
(4)The evidence of financial capacity is the primary applicant’s completed AASES form.
Note: AASES form is defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations to mean for a secondary exchange student, an Acceptance Advice of Secondary Exchange Student form from the relevant State or Territory education authority, containing the following declarations:
(a) a declaration made by the student’s exchange organisation, accepting the student;
(b) a declaration made by the student’s parent, or the person or persons having custody of the student, agreeing to the exchange.
(5)If the primary applicant is a Foreign Affairs student – the evidence of financial capacity is a letter of support from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
(6) If the primary applicant is a Defence student – the evidence of financial capacity is a letter of support from the Department of Defence.
7 Subclause 500 (Student) visa—secondary applicants
(1)For the purposes of subclause 500.313(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a secondary applicant who is included in the primary student visa holder’s application, must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsection (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).
(2)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is in the form specified in section 10; and
(b)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the primary student visa holder set out in subparagraphs 6(2)(b)(i) to (iii) of this Part; and
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary applicant making a combined application with the primary student visa holder specified in paragraphs 6(2)(c)(i) to (iv) of this Part.
(3)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary student visa holder’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income that is at least AUD72,592.
(4)If the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(5)If the primary student visa holder is a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(6) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Defence will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(6)If:
(a)the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student or a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) or (6) of this Part; but
(b)the letter of support does not indicate that the relevant department will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant;
then the evidence of financial capacity:
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the secondary applicant specified in paragraphs 6(2)(c)(i) to (iv) of this Part.
8 Subclass 500 (Student) visa – secondary applicants not included in the primary student visa holder’s application
(1) For the purposes of subclause 500.313(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, a secondary applicant (the first secondary applicant), who is not included in the primary student visa holder’s application, must give to the Minister evidence of financial capacity that satisfies the requirements of subsection (2), (3), (4), (5) or (6).
(2) The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is in the form specified in section 10; and
(b)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of the primary student visa holder specified in subparagraph 6(2)(b)(ii) of this Part; and
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet course fees for any component of the primary student visa holder’s course of study which will be completed while the first secondary applicant is in Australia, up to an amount equivalent to fees for 12 months of the course of study, minus any amount already paid; and
(d)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary student visa holder and that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own costs and expenses, and the costs and expenses of each additional secondary applicant making a combined application with the first secondary applicant, specified in subparagraphs 6(2)(c)(ii) to (iv) of this Part; and
(e)demonstrates that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own travel expenses and the travel expenses of all additional secondary applicants making a combined application with the first secondary applicant.
(3)The evidence of financial capacity:
(a)is official Government documentation of personal income that has been issued in the 12 months immediately before the application is made; and
(b)demonstrates that the primary student visa holder’s parent, spouse or de facto partner has a personal annual income that is at least AUD72,592.
(4)If the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(5)If the primary student visa holder is a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(6) of this Part – the evidence of financial capacity is the letter of support if the letter of support indicates that the Department of Defence will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant.
(6)If:
(a)the primary student visa holder is a Foreign Affairs student or a Defence student and has provided a letter of support mentioned in subsection 6(5) or (6) of this Part; but
(b)the letter of support does not indicate that the relevant department will meet the living costs and expenses of each secondary applicant;
then the evidence of financial capacity:
(c)demonstrates that sufficient funds are available to meet the costs and expenses of each secondary student visa holder and that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own costs and expenses, and the costs and expenses of each additional secondary applicant making a combined application with the first secondary applicant, specified in subparagraphs 6(2)(c)(ii) to (iv) of this Part; and
(d)demonstrates that the first secondary applicant has sufficient funds available to meet their own travel expenses and the travel expenses of all secondary applicants making a combined application with the first secondary applicant.
…
10 Evidence of financial capacity
The following forms of evidence of financial capacity are specified:
(a)money deposit with a financial institution;
(b)loan with a financial institution;
(c)government loans;
(d)scholarship or financial support.
11 Pro rata equivalent
In this Part, the pro rata equivalent of annual costs is calculated by:
(a)dividing the annual amount by 365; and
(b)multiplying the resulting number by the number of days the applicant is intending to stay in Australia.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
-
Jurisdiction
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0