Kaur (Migration)

[2020] AATA 4738

Kaur (Migration) [2020] AATA 4738 (12 November 2020)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Ms Bhupinder Kaur

CASE NUMBER:  1814283

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2016/2392202

MEMBER:Phoebe Dunn

DATE:12 November 2020

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

·cl.187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 12 November 2020 at 2:16pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa – Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) – Direct Entry stream – Cook (ANZSCO 351411) – tribunal set aside nomination refusal – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 360(2)(a)
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 187.233(3), rr 1.13A, 1.13B

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 18 July 2016. At the time of application, Class RN contained one subclass: Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme).

3. The criteria for a Subclass 187 visa are set out in Part 187 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). The primary criteria must be satisfied by at least one applicant. Other members of the family unit, if any, who are applicants for the visa need satisfy only the secondary criteria. Applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria must meet the 'Common criteria', as well as the criteria of one of two alternative visa streams: the Temporary Residence Transition stream, or the Direct Entry stream.

4. In the present case, the applicant is seeking the visa in the Direct Entry stream, to work in the nominated position of Cook (ANZSCO 351411).

5. The delegate refused to grant the visa because the applicant did not meet cl.187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations because the related nomination application by Vangate Pty Ltd (the nominator), being the nomination referred to in cl.187.233(1) (the nomination), was refused by a delegate of the Minister on 15 March 2018 and as such there was no approved nomination.

6. In reaching its decision, the Tribunal did not consider a hearing in relation to this matter to be necessary, as it was able to find in favour of the visa applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to s.360(2)(a) of the Act.

7. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by her registered migration agent, Natale Menniti.

8. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

9. The issue in the present case is whether there is an approved nomination.

   Nomination of a position

10. Clause 187.233 as applicable in this case is set out in full in an attachment to this decision. Essentially, it requires that the position to which the application relates be the subject of an application for approval of a nomination in the Direct Entry stream, located in regional Australia. The position must be the one that was the subject of the declaration made as part of the current visa application. In addition, where the associated nomination was made on or after 1 July 2017, it must identify the applicant in relation to the position.

11. In addition, this criterion also requires that:

    ·the person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination;

    ·the nomination has been approved and has not been subsequently withdrawn;

    ·there is no ‘adverse information’ known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person ‘associated with’ that person (within the meaning of r.1.13A and r.1.13B); or it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    ·the position is still available to the applicant; and

    ·the visa application was made no more than six months after the nomination of the position was approved.

12. The applicant applied for the Subclass 187 visa on the basis of the nomination application made by the nominator.  The nomination application was refused and as such the applicant’s Subclass 187 visa application was also refused as the applicant did not meet cl.187.233(3) which requires that the related nomination be approved.

13. The nominator applied for review of the decision to refuse the nomination. On 10 November 2020, the Tribunal set aside the Department’s decision and substituted a decision approving the nomination.

14. As the relevant nomination in respect of the applicant has been approved, the applicant meets the requirements of cl.187.233(3).  Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that cl.187.233(3) is met.

15. Given this finding, the appropriate course is to remit the visa application to the Minister to consider the remaining criteria for the visa.

    DECISION

16. The Tribunal remits the application for a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa:

    ·cl.187.233(3) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Phoebe Dunn
    Member

    
    

    ATTACHMENT A

    187.233(1)     The position to which the application relates is the position:

    (a)nominated in an application for approval that seeks to meet the requirements of:

    (i)subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii); or

    (ii)subregulation 5.19(4) as in force before 1 July 2012; and

    (b)in relation to which the declaration mentioned in paragraph 1114C(3)(d) of Schedule 1 was made in the application for the grant of the visa.

    (2)     The person who will employ the applicant is the person who made the nomination.

    (3)     The Minister has approved the nomination.

    (4)     The nomination has not subsequently been withdrawn.

    (4A)    Either:

    (a)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person; or

    (b)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the person who made the nomination or a person associated with that person.

    (5)     The position is still available to the applicant.

    (6)     The application for the visa is made no more than 6 months after the Minister approved the nomination.