Kaube and Randall

Case [2018] FamCA 749


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KAUBE & RANDALL [2018] FamCA 749
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Best interests – Where there are allegations that the father has perpetrated family violence in a number of relationships – Where the father admits to being a perpetrator of family violence – Where the mother has symptoms of anxiety and post-traumatic stress triggered by the father spending time with the child – Where there are concerns about the father’s alcohol use– Where the expert recommends that the father undergoes long term psychotherapy – Where the father has not sought to change his behaviour – Where the child has only spent supervised time with the father since she was an infant – Where it is in the best interests of the child to spend no time with the father – Where the mother has sole parental responsibility for the child – Identity contact – Absence of evidence concerning frequency of identity contact in family law context.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 4, 60CC, 60CA 61C, 61DA
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s140(2)
Mazorski & Albright (2007) Fam LR 518
McCall & Clark (2009) FLC 93-405; 41 Fam LR 483; [2009] FamCAFC 92
G & C [2006] FamCA 994
APPLICANT: Ms Kaube
RESPONDENT: Mr Randall
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Legal Aid NSW Sydney
FILE NUMBER: PAC 5062 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 21 September 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Parramatta
PLACE HEARD: Parramatta
JUDGMENT OF: Hannam J
HEARING DATE: 12 - 14 June 2018

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms Mahony of Counsel
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Adams & Partners Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Gardiner of Counsel
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: A R Walmsley and Co
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Mr Ladopoulos of Counsel
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Legal Aid NSW Sydney

Orders

  1. The child X, born … 2014 (“the child”) shall live with the mother.

  2. The mother shall have sole parental responsibility for the child.

  3. The father shall spend no time with the child.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Kaube & Randall has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA

FILE NUMBER: PAC 5062 of 2014

Ms Kaube

Applicant

And

Mr Randall

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. These proceedings concern four year old X (“the child”) the only child of Ms Kaube (“the mother”) and Mr Randall (“the father”).

  2. The parties’ lengthy relationship of over 20 years ended in July 2014 when the child was three months old.  Since separation the child has…

Continue reading Kaube and Randall

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kaube and Randall [2018] FamCA 749
Case
[2018] FamCA 749
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Kaube and Randall*, heard by Hannam J, the dispute concerned parenting orders for a child born in 2014. The court was required to determine the living arrangements for the child and the extent of parental responsibility to be allocated to each parent, as well as whether the father should have any time with the child.

The court's reasoning and the principles applied are not detailed in the provided extract. However, the orders made indicate a significant departure from typical shared parenting arrangements.

The court ordered that the child shall live with the mother and that the mother shall have sole parental responsibility for the child. Crucially, the father was ordered to spend no time with the child.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The child X, born … 2014 (“the child”) shall live with the mother.

2.

The mother shall have sole parental responsibility for the child.

3.

The father shall spend no time with the child.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.