Kattan & Nahas

Case [2021] FamCA 461


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Kattan & Nahas [2021] FamCA 461

File number(s): BRC 10442 of 2016
Judgment of: BAUMANN J
Date of judgment: 30 June 2021
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Where the Respondent says the Applicant’s Initiating Application is doomed to fail – Where the Respondent seeks the application be summarily dismissed –Where the Applicant seeks that the children live with him overseas – Where only part of the Applicant’s application is doomed to fail – Orders seeking the children reside overseas with the Applicant summarily dismissed.
Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 45A

Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)

Cases cited:

Beck & Beck [2004] FLC 93-181

Friar & Friar [2011] FamCA 71

Line & Line (1997) FLC 92-729

Number of paragraphs: 31
Date of last submission/s: 18 June 2021
Date of hearing: 18 June 2021
Place: Brisbane
Solicitor for the Applicant: Self-represented
Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Mr S Seth, Seth Solicitors
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr L Bertrand, Sterling Law (Qld)

ORDERS

BRC 10442 of 2016
BETWEEN:

MR KATTAN

Applicant

AND:

MS NAHAS

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

BAUMANN J

DATE OF ORDER:

30 JUNE 2021

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:

1.That the Applicant’s application for the children, X born … 2005, Y born … 2010 and Y born … 2012 (“the children”) to live with him outside of Australia and in Country B is summarily dismissed.

2.That the Court identifies the main issues requiring determination at a final hearing to be:

(a)parental responsibility for major long term issues;

(b)whether, and on what conditions (if any), the children should be permitted to visit the father in Country B; and

(c)whether, and on what conditions (if any), the children spend time with the father in Australia (noting an Airport Watch List Order remains in existence).

3.That the remaining issues for determination by the Court are listed for Final Hearing for not more than two (2) days commencing at 10.00am (Queensland, Australia time) on 7 October 2021 in the Family Court of Australia at Brisbane by video via Microsoft Teams.

4.That each party shall file and serve on each other no later than 4.00pm on 9 September 2021, any affidavit material to be relied upon in respect of the issues in dispute, as identified in this Order.

5.That the Applicant pay any hearing fee or seek a waiver of the fee no later than 4.00pm on 9 September 2021.

6.That each party file and serve on each other no later than 4.00pm on 30 September 2021, a case outline setting out:

(a)a precise minute of the final orders sought;

(b)a relevant chronology; and

(c)a list of Affidavits and Applications and/or Responses intended to be relied upon at trial.

7.That in the event that either party wishes to cross examine the family report writer at the Final Hearing, that party shall provide written notice to the family report writer of such intention as soon as reasonably practicable, but by no later…

Continue reading Kattan & Nahas

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kattan & Nahas [2021] FamCA 461
Case
[2021] FamCA 461
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, Mr Kattan (the Applicant) sought orders that his children reside with him overseas in Country B, while Ms Nahas (the Respondent) sought the summary dismissal of the Applicant's Initiating Application.

The central legal issue before Baumann J was whether the Applicant's application for the children to live with him overseas was "doomed to fail," warranting summary dismissal. The court was required to determine which parts, if any, of the Applicant's application could be summarily dismissed and what issues remained for a final hearing.

Baumann J reasoned that while the Applicant's request for the children to live with him overseas was indeed doomed to fail, other significant issues required determination. These included questions of parental responsibility for major long-term issues, the conditions under which the children might visit the father in Country B, and the conditions for the children spending time with the father in Australia, noting an existing Airport Watch List Order. The court therefore summarily dismissed the application for the children to live overseas but identified the remaining issues for a final hearing.

The court ordered that the Applicant's application for the children to live with him outside of Australia be summarily dismissed. The remaining issues were listed for a final hearing on 7 October 2021, with directions for the filing of affidavit material, case outlines, and notice regarding cross-examination of the family report writer.

Orders

Orders of the court

BRC 10442 of 2016

BETWEEN:

MR KATTAN

Applicant

AND:

MS NAHAS

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

BAUMANN J

DATE OF ORDER:

30 JUNE 2021

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:

1. That the Applicant’s application for the children, X born … 2005, Y born … 2010 and Y born … 2012 (“the children”) to live with him outside of Australia and in Country B is summarily dismissed.

2. That the Court identifies the main issues requiring determination at a final hearing to be:

(a) parental responsibility for major long term issues;

(b) whether, and on what conditions (if any), the children should be permitted to visit the father in Country B; and

(c) whether, and on what conditions (if any), the children spend time with the father in Australia (noting an Airport Watch List Order remains in existence).

3. That the remaining issues for determination by the Court are listed for Final Hearing for not more than two (2) days commencing at 10.00am (Queensland, Australia time) on 7 October 2021 in the Family Court of Australia at Brisbane by video via Microsoft Teams.

4. That each party shall file and serve on each other no later than 4.00pm on 9 September 2021, any affidavit material to be relied upon in respect of the issues in dispute, as identified in this Order.

5. That the Applicant pay any hearing fee or seek a waiver of the fee no later than 4.00pm on 9 September 2021.

6. That each party file and serve on each other no later than 4.00pm on 30 September 2021, a case outline setting out:

(a) a precise minute of the final orders sought;

(b) a relevant chronology; and

(c) a list of Affidavits and Applications and/or Responses intended to be relied upon at trial.

7. That in the event that either party wishes to cross examine the family report writer at the Final Hearing, that party shall provide written notice to the family report writer of such intention as soon as reasonably practicable, but by no later than 4.00pm on 16 September 2021.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.