Karson v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd

Case

[2004] FMCA 1008

14 December 2004


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KARSON v ESANDA FINANCE CORPORATION LTD [2004] FMCA 1008
BANKRUPTCY – Application for adjournment – where letter fails to satisfy the court.
Applicant: MANUAL KARSON
Respondent: ESANDA FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED ACN 004 346 043
File No: SYG 3426 of 2004
Delivered on: 14 December 2004
Delivered at: Sydney
Hearing date: 14 December 2004
Judgment of: Raphael FM

REPRESENTATION

Solicitors for the Applicant: Konstan Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Cohen
Solicitors for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron

ORDERS

  1. Leave granted to withdraw application.

  2. Applicant to pay the respondent’s costs.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

SYG 3426 of 2004

MANUAL KARSON

Applicant

And

ESANDA FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 004 346 043)

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. I have considered the correspondence forwarded to my associate including a confidential letter sent to “To Whom It May Concern” in the following form:

    “This is to certify that Manni Karson (d.o.b. 12 June 1967) has been admitted to South Pacific Private Hospital for a rehabilitation program. Mr Karson was admitted on 24 November 2004 and is due for discharge on 25 December 2004.”

    and it is signed by Mr Quan the Clinical Director.  Regrettably this document does not give me very much insight into Mr Karson's medical condition nor does it say that he is unable to attend at court or provide instructions to solicitors.

  2. In those circumstances I am not satisfied that it is a matter which would persuade me to adjourn these proceedings until 2005 as requested by his solicitors.

  3. The applicant has now sought leave to withdraw the application.  That leave is granted.  The applicant must pay the respondent's costs.

I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Raphael FM

Associate: 

Date: 

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0