KAPOOR v Minister for Immigration
[2014] FCCA 3167
•26 May 2014
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| KAPOOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2014] FCCA 3167 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Judicial review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal. |
| Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), r.13.03C Migration Act 1958 (Cth) |
| Applicant: | LALIT KAPOOR |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | ADG 302 of 2013 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Simpson |
| Hearing date: | 26 May 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 26 May 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Adelaide |
| Delivered on: | 26 May 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicant: | No appearance |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Mr P d'Assumpcao for the Australian Government Solicitors |
ORDERS
Pursuant to r.13.03C of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) the application be dismissed.
The Applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the amount of SIX THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY SIX DOLLARS ($6,646.00).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT ADELAIDE |
ADG 302 of 2013
| LALIT KAPOOR |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Reasons settled from transcript)
I have before me an application for judicial review filed on 21 October 2013.
On 20 May, the Applicant filed an affidavit annexing a medical certificate which said that he – the Applicant, that is – had lower back pain and right leg pain and that he was unfit for work from 19 May 2014 to 23 May 2014. It also said that he could resume work on 24 May 2014.
As a result of that certificate, the Court contacted the Applicant on 21 May to arrange a suitable time for the Applicant to be able to appear and to put whatever submissions he wished to in relation to this matter.
He was contacted by telephone to the courtroom. I indicated to him that I was considering listing the matter for 3.00pm on 26 May 2014, but only if it was convenient for the Applicant to appear. The Applicant indicated that that would be a suitable time and that he would be able to appear on that day.
The Applicant’s name has now been called three times and he has not appeared. The time is now 7 minutes past 3 o’clock – well past the time that he should have been here.
There has been no contact with the Court by the Applicant to advise that he would be unable to appear. In the circumstances, I can only assume that the Applicant has decided not to proceed with the application.
I propose to dismiss the application with costs.
I make the orders to be found at the beginning of these reasons.
I certify that the preceding eight (8) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Simpson
Associate:
Date: 7 May 2015
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
3