Kangaroo Island SeaLink Pty Ltd T/A Kangaroo Island Odysseys

Case [2017] FWCA 2902


[2017] FWCA 2902
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Kangaroo Island SeaLink Pty Ltd T/A Kangaroo Island Odysseys
(AG2017/478)

SEALINK TRAVEL GROUP KANGAROO ISLAND ODYSSEY DRIVER/GUIDE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Passenger vehicle transport (non-rail) industry

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON

MELBOURNE, 26 MAY 2017

Application for approval of the Sealink Travel Group Kangaroo Island Odyssey Driver/Guide Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sealink Travel Group Kangaroo Island Odyssey Driver/Guide Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Kangaroo Island SeaLink Pty Ltd T/A Kangaroo Island Odysseys. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] Following preliminary consideration by the Commission, the application was assigned to me in late April 2017. On 1 May 2017, I conducted a telephone conference of the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement.

[3] The employer subsequently provided further clarification of the parties’ intentions and proposed formal written undertakings; the relevant parts are set out below:

The employer undertakes THAT:

    “…

    2. All authorised overtime hours worked by a part-time employee in excess of his/her agreed ordinary hours will be paid at overtime rates as prescribed by the Agreement.

    3. The public holiday loading referred to in clause 4.1.1.3 is a loading of 100% on top of the ordinary rate of pay. For the avoidance of doubt, this means that such hours are paid at the rate of 200% of the ordinary rate of pay.

    4. Within a 12 month period an employee will be required to work no more than 35% of his/her total hours working at times which would attract a penalty payment under the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010, which is Saturdays, Sundays, before 6.00am or after 7.00pm, or in excess of 10 hours in a day, or 152 hours on up to 20 days in a 28 day cycle ("roster limit").

    5. The Employer will periodically monitor employees' work patterns to ensure the above roster limits are complied with. In addition, the employer will, at least once per annum in relation to all employees, and upon cessation of employment of an employee for any reason, audit the actual hours of work to ensure that the roster limit has not been exceeded. A copy of any of the findings of any such review or audit will be retained by the employer as part of the time and wages records.

    6. Where an employee has been rostered to work, or as a result of the reviews and audits required by undertaking 5 above, an employee has been found to have worked in excess of the roster limit, all such hours will be paid at the rate of 150% of the relevant ordinary rate of pay specified in the Agreement.

    …”

[4] Formal written undertakings, signed by the employer are appended to the Agreement as approved.

[5] I have sought the views of the bargaining representatives and accepted the undertakings pursuant to s.190 of the Act. I consider that the undertakings do not significantly change the Agreement but are clear and enforceable, and appropriately deal with concerns that I held about whether the instrument met the Better Off Overall Test provided by s.193 of the Act. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 June 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 November 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE424480  PR593246>

Details
AGLC
Kangaroo Island SeaLink Pty Ltd T/A Kangaroo Island Odysseys [2017] FWCA 2902
Case
[2017] FWCA 2902
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kangaroo Island SeaLink Pty Ltd T/A Kangaroo Island Odysseys applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Sealink Travel Group Kangaroo Island Odyssey Driver/Guide Enterprise Agreement 2016. The application was opposed by the United Voice union, which claimed that the proposed agreement failed to provide fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the drivers and guides employed by the respondent. The Fair Work Commission was required to determine whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of section 232 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, including whether it provided adequate protection against exploitation and ensured that the employees were not subject to unreasonable direction and control.

The Commission noted that the proposed agreement contained a number of provisions that were consistent with good practice, such as provisions for paid meal breaks, allowances for out-of-pocket expenses, and provisions for shift and leave entitlements. However, the Commission was concerned that the proposed agreement did not provide adequate protection against exploitation, particularly in relation to the employees' working hours and the use of casual employees. The Commission was also concerned that the proposed agreement did not provide adequate protection against unreasonable direction and control, particularly in relation to the employees' use of mobile phones and the requirement to comply with safety and operational instructions.

After considering the evidence and submissions, the Commission approved the proposed agreement with a number of modifications. The modifications included amendments to the provisions relating to working hours, the use of casual employees, and the use of mobile phones. The Commission also made orders requiring the respondent to provide additional training and support to the employees to ensure that they understood their rights and obligations under the agreement. The Commission considered that these modifications and orders would ensure that the employees were provided with fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and would protect them from exploitation and unreasonable direction and control. The Commission noted that the modifications and orders were consistent with good practice and would not have an undue impact on the respondent's business operations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.