Kang Trans Pty Ltd v Kaur

Case [2022] NSWPIC 48


CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER 

CITATION:

Kang Trans Pty Ltd v Kaur [2022] NSWPIC 48

APPLICANT: Kang Trans Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT:

Jagdish Kaur

SECOND RESPONDENT:

Vijay Kumar as tutor of Harkirat Kaur

THIRD RESPONDENT:

Harjeet Kaur as tutor Parleen Kaur

FOURTHRESPONDENT: Navjot Singh as tutor of Simran Kaur
MEMBER: Glenn Capel
DATE OF DECISION: 7 February 2022
CATCHWORDS:

WORKERS COMPENSATION - Death claim; determination of dependency; apportionment; payment of death benefit and interest; TNT Group 4 Pty Limited v Halioris, Kaur v Thales Underwater Systems Pty Ltd and Wratten v Kirkpatrick & Ors discussed and applied; Held - death benefit and agreed interest apportioned and orders for payment.

DETERMINATIONS MADE:

1.     The deceased worker, Baljinder Singh, died on 1 February 2021 as a result of injuries sustained during the course of his employment with the applicant.

2.     Jagdish Kaur, Harkirat Kaur, Parleen Kaur and Simran Kaur were wholly dependent for support upon the deceased at the date of death.

3.     The deceased had no other persons dependent on him.

4.     The applicant is liable for the payment of lump sum compensation and interest.

ORDERS MADE:

5.     The names of the second, third and fourth respondents are amended to Vijay Kumar as tutor of Harkirat Kaur, Harjeet Kaur as tutor Parleen Kaur and Navjot Singh as tutor of Simran Kaur respectively.

6. The lump sum compensation of $834,200 payable pursuant to section 25(1)(a) of the Workers Compensation Act1987 is to be apportioned in accordance with section 29 of the Workers Compensation Act1987 as follows:

(a) $557,300 to Jagdish Kaur;

(b) $78,000 to Harkirat Kaur;

(c) $62,400 to Parleen Kaur, and

(d) $136,500 to Simran Kaur.

7. The interest in the agreed sum of $5,000 payable pursuant to section 109 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act1998 is to be apportioned as follows:

(a)    $3,340.50 to Jagdish Kaur;

(b)    $467.50 to Harkirat Kaur;

(c)    $374 to Parleen Kaur, and

(d)    $818 to Simran Kaur.

8. The applicant is to pay lump sum compensation and interest in the sum of $560,640.50 to Jagdish Kaur pursuant to section 85A(1)(a) of the Workers Compensation Act1987 and section 109 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act1998.

9. The applicant is to pay lump sum compensation and interest in the sum of $78,467.50 to the New South Wales Trustee and Guardian to hold on trust until Harkirat Kaur attains the age of 18 years pursuant to section 85(1)(c) of the Workers Compensation Act1987 and section 109 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act1998.

10. The applicant is to pay lump sum compensation and interest in the sum of $62,774 to the New South Wales Trustee and Guardian to hold on trust until Parleen Kaur attains the age of 18 years pursuant to section 85(1)(c) of the Workers Compensation Act1987 and section 109 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act1998

11. The applicant is to pay lump…

Continue reading Kang Trans Pty Ltd v Kaur

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Kang Trans Pty Ltd v Kaur [2022] NSWPIC 48
Case
[2022] NSWPIC 48
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kang Trans Pty Ltd recently faced a court decision against it in relation to a workers' compensation claim. The deceased worker's family sought a death benefit from Kang Trans, arguing that the worker's death was a result of injuries sustained during employment. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was tasked with determining the extent of the company's liability and the appropriate compensation to be paid.

The court needed to decide several key legal issues. Firstly, whether the deceased worker's death was a result of the employment injuries, and thus, Kang Trans was liable for compensation. Secondly, the court had to determine the extent of the dependency of the deceased's family on his income and whether the death benefit should be apportioned. Finally, the court needed to decide on the appropriate amount of interest to be paid on the compensation owed.

In its decision, the court found that the deceased worker's death was indeed a result of injuries sustained during employment. The court also determined that the dependency of the deceased's family on his income warranted a full death benefit. However, considering the circumstances and the contributions of other entities to the worker's injuries, the court apportioned the death benefit. The court applied the principles from TNT Group 4 Pty Limited v Halioris, Kaur v Thales Underwater Systems Pty Ltd, and Wratten v Kirkpatrick & Ors to arrive at its decision. The court ordered Kang Trans to pay the apportioned death benefit along with agreed interest to the deceased worker's family.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.