FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)
Kalnins & Vollis [2023] FedCFamC2F 159
File number(s): PAC 2389 of 2021 Judgment of: JUDGE STREET Date of judgment: 17 February 2023 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – whether there was a de facto relationship – de facto relationship commenced 2007 and continued until December 2020 – property adjustment – just and equitable – orders for sale and division of relevant property Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) pt VIIIAB; ss 4AA, 44(6), 75(2), 90RD, 90RG, 90SB, 90SF, 90SF(3), 90SK, 90SM, 90SM(3), 90SM(4)(a)-(c) Cases cited: Estate of Gardner [2019] NSWSC 1324
Fairbairn & Radecki [2002] HCA 18
Fitzmaurice & Woolridge[2020] FamCAFC 64
Hickey and Hickey and Attorney-General (Cth) (Intervener) [2003] FamCA 395
Radecki v Fairbairn [2020] FamCAFC 307
Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108
Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 95 Date of last submissions: 9 December 2022 Date of hearing: 17 and 18 November 2022 Place: Parramatta Counsel for the Applicant: Ms S Abdelraheem Solicitor for the Applicant: Khalil Family Lawyers Pty Ltd Counsel for the Respondent: Mr L Reeves Solicitor for the Respondent: Phillip A Wilkins & Associates ORDERS
PAC 2389 of 2021 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN: MS KALNINS
Applicant
AND: MR VOLLIS
Respondent
order made by:
JUDGE STREET
DATE OF ORDER:
17 February 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the Court declares that the Applicant and Respondent were in a de facto relationship from 2007 to December 2020.
2.Pursuant to s 90SM of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), the de facto husband forthwith take all necessary steps and execute all necessary documents to cause the property situated at B Street, Suburb C (“B Street, Suburb C property”) to be sold by private treaty at the earliest possible date at a price to be agreed on between the parties, and failing such agreement the price be determined by the proper officer of the Real Estate Institute or their nominee, and that the proceeds of the sale be disbursed as follows:
(a)Payment of agent’s commission, advertising expenses and legal expenses of the sale;
(b)Payment of any money due and owing to the mortgagee;
(c)The net balance to be divided between the parties as follows:
(i)63.5% to the de facto wife; and
(ii)36.5% to the de facto husband.
3.That in the event the B Street, Suburb C property fails to be sold by private treaty within a period of 3 months hereof, then each party take all necessary steps and execute all necessary documents to cause the said property to be sold by auction at the earliest possible date at a reserve to be agreed upon between the parties and failing such agreement to be determined by the proper officer of the Real Estate Institute or their nominee, and that the proceeds of the said sale be disbursed as follows:
(a)Payment of agent’s commission,…
Continue reading Kalnins & Vollis
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Kalnins & Vollis [2023] FedCFamC2F 159
- Case
- [2023] FedCFamC2F 159
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.