[2013] FWCA 9248 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Kalmar Equipment (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9918)
KALMAR EQUIPMENT (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (MELBOURNE AND BRISBANE) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2015
Stevedoring industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 25 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Kalmar Equipment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Melbourne and Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015.
[1] On 28 October 2013 an application was made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Kalmar Equipment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Melbourne and Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) by Kalmar Equipment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] The Fair Work Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[4] The Maritime Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 2 December 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 May 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405535 PR544942>
- AGLC
- Kalmar Equipment (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 9248
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 9248
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for the appropriate terms and conditions of employment, whether it was free from prohibited content, and whether it met the requirements for prior approval under the Act. Specifically, the CFMEU argued that certain provisions in the agreement were not fair and did not adequately protect the interests of the employees. The Commission had to determine if the agreement was consistent with the provisions of the Act and if it was made in good faith.
In assessing the application, the Commission examined the contents of the agreement and considered the submissions from both parties. The Commission found that the agreement was free from prohibited content and was made in good faith. It concluded that the terms and conditions provided for in the agreement were fair and met the requirements of the Act. Therefore, the Commission approved the application for the agreement to be registered.
The final orders included the registration of the Kalmar Equipment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Melbourne and Brisbane) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be binding on the employees covered by it, and the CFMEU's objections were dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.