FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| KALMAR & GUIDI & ANOR | [2019] FCCA 2615 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting proceedings – proceedings transferred to the Family Court of Australia – order made. |
| Legislation: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, s.39 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.8.02 |
| Cases cited: Morris & Rosetti [2017] FamCA 249 |
| Applicant: | MR KALMAR |
| First Respondent: | MS GUIDI |
| Second Respondent: | MS KURZ |
| File Number: | PAC 5209 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Newbrun |
| Hearing date: | 6 September 2019 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 6 September 2019 |
| Delivered at: | Parramatta |
| Delivered on: | 20 September 2019 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicant in person |
| The First Respondent in person |
| Ms Hall for the Second Respondent: |
| Ms Shedden for the Independent Children’s Lawyer: |
ORDERS
These proceedings are forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta, with the matter to be mentioned on 1 October 2019 at 9:30 am.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Kalmar & Guidi & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA |
PAC 5209 of 2017
| MR KALMAR |
Applicant
And
| MS GUIDI |
First Respondent
| MS KURZ |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
The within Reasons for Judgment relate to this Court’s Order of today that these parenting proceedings be transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta.
The subject child is [X] born … 2008.
As discussed below, in the view of the court these parenting proceedings are, in particular, complex, and, further, are likely to take in excess of four final hearing days.
The Court refers to the very detailed and lengthy family report of family consultant Ms A dated 3 September 2019.
According to the mother, she is a C woman whose mob is from Town B area, and thereby the child is aboriginal.
The mother and father are presently legally unrepresented. Today the Court made orders under section 102NA of the Family Law Act, 1975. Accordingly, it is anticipated that legal representatives will be appointed for the parties, through legal aid New South Wales, prior to any final hearing.
The child lives with the father and Ms Guidi, his partner. Also living with the father and his partner are his partner’s children from previous relationships, two daughters. The father is aged 44 years. Ms Guidi was made a party the proceeding some time ago in circumstances where the father was jailed at a time when the child was living with the father and Ms Guidi, and there existed alleged risks of harm to the child being returned to the mother’s primary care.
The child is not presently spending time with the mother. The mother is aged 37 years.
The mother has a child from a previous relationship, [Y], aged 17 years, and that child is under the care of D Child Guardians and she sees him periodically.
The mother has historically declined to take up the opportunity to spend time with the child under supervision, the mother…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kalmar and Guidi and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] FCCA 2615
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate forum for the parenting proceedings. The court was required to determine whether to retain jurisdiction or to transfer the proceedings to another court.
Judge Newbrun ordered that the proceedings be forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta. The matter was scheduled to be mentioned again on 1 October 2019 at 9:30 am.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
These proceedings are forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta, with the matter to be mentioned on 1 October 2019 at 9:30 am.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.