Kalmar and Guidi and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KALMAR & GUIDI & ANOR [2019] FCCA 2615
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting proceedings – proceedings transferred to the Family Court of Australia – order made.

Legislation:

Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, s.39

Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.8.02

Cases cited:

Morris & Rosetti [2017] FamCA 249

Applicant: MR KALMAR
First Respondent: MS GUIDI
Second Respondent: MS KURZ
File Number: PAC 5209 of 2017
Judgment of: Judge Newbrun
Hearing date: 6 September 2019
Date of Last Submission: 6 September 2019
Delivered at: Parramatta
Delivered on: 20 September 2019

REPRESENTATION

The Applicant in person
The First Respondent in person
Ms Hall for the Second Respondent:
Ms Shedden for the Independent Children’s Lawyer:

ORDERS

  1. These proceedings are forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta, with the matter to be mentioned on 1 October 2019 at 9:30 am.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Kalmar & Guidi & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT PARRAMATTA

PAC 5209 of 2017

MR KALMAR

Applicant

And

MS GUIDI

First Respondent

MS KURZ

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The within Reasons for Judgment relate to this Court’s Order of today that these parenting proceedings be transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta.

  2. The subject child is [X] born … 2008.

  3. As discussed below, in the view of the court these parenting proceedings are, in particular, complex, and, further, are likely to take in excess of four final hearing days.

  4. The Court refers to the very detailed and lengthy family report of family consultant Ms A dated 3 September 2019.

  5. According to the mother, she is a C woman whose mob is from Town B area, and thereby the child is aboriginal. 

  6. The mother and father are presently legally unrepresented. Today the Court made orders under section 102NA of the Family Law Act, 1975. Accordingly, it is anticipated that legal representatives will be appointed for the parties, through legal aid New South Wales, prior to any final hearing.

  7. The child lives with the father and Ms Guidi, his partner.  Also living with the father and his partner are his partner’s children from previous relationships, two daughters. The father is aged 44 years.  Ms Guidi was made a party the proceeding some time ago in circumstances where the father was jailed at a time when the child was living with the father and Ms Guidi, and there existed alleged risks of harm to the child being returned to the mother’s primary care.

  8. The child is not presently spending time with the mother.  The mother is aged 37 years.

  9. The mother has a child from a previous relationship, [Y], aged 17 years, and that child is under the care of D Child Guardians and she sees him periodically.

  10. The mother has historically declined to take up the opportunity to spend time with the child under supervision, the mother…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kalmar and Guidi and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] FCCA 2615
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The proceedings involved parties identified as Kalmar and Guidi and another. The core of the dispute concerned parenting matters, which had been transferred to the Family Court of Australia. Judge Newbrun presided over the matter.

The primary legal issue before the court was the appropriate forum for the parenting proceedings. The court was required to determine whether to retain jurisdiction or to transfer the proceedings to another court.

Judge Newbrun ordered that the proceedings be forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta. The matter was scheduled to be mentioned again on 1 October 2019 at 9:30 am.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

These proceedings are forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta, with the matter to be mentioned on 1 October 2019 at 9:30 am.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.