| [2015] FWCA 5152 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
K & S Freighters
(AG2015/3317)
DTM WA FREMANTLE AND TWU (WA) FUEL TRANSPORT AGREEMENT 2015
Road transport industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 29 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the DTM WA Fremantle and TWU (WA) Fuel Transport Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DTM WA Fremantle and TWU (WA) Fuel Transport Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by K & S Freighters. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 29 July 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 5 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 July 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415012 PR569913>
- AGLC
- K & S Freighters [2015] FWCA 5152
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 5152
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections 234 and 235. Section 234 requires that an agreement must be certified as "not objected to on the ground of its consistency with the provisions of this Act", while section 235 provides for the criteria for the approval of an agreement. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements of these sections and whether it was fair and reasonable in all its terms.
The Commission found that the agreement was consistent with the provisions of the Act and met the criteria for approval. The Commission considered the provisions of the agreement and found that they were not contrary to any of the provisions of the Act. The Commission also found that the agreement was fair and reasonable in all its terms, taking into account the need for a fair balance between the interests of the employees and the employer. The Commission approved the agreement, and it came into effect on 1 July 2015.
The Commission's decision was based on its finding that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for the employees of the company, and that it was not contrary to any of the provisions of the Act. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits for the employees, including provisions for pay rates, leave entitlements, and other terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also noted that the agreement provided for a process for the resolution of disputes between the employer and the employees, which was an important factor in the approval of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.