Jurisdiction Of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NT)

No judgment structure available for this case.

NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA

JURISDICTION OF COURTS (CROSS-VESTING) ACT 1987

As in force at 1 January 2022

Table of provisions [if supportFields]> TOC \o "1-9" <![endif] — Short title2 — Commencement3 — Interpretation3A — Corporations Act of the CommonwealthCorporations Act of the Commonwealth4 — Vesting of additional jurisdiction in certain Courts5 — Transfer of proceedings6 — Special federal matters7 — Institution and hearing of appeals8 — Orders by Supreme Court9 — Exercise of jurisdiction pursuant to cross-vesting laws10 — Transfer of matters arising under certain provisions of the Australian Consumer Law applying as a law of the Commonwealth11 — Conduct of proceedings12 — Orders as to costs13 — Limitation on appeals14 — Enforcement and effect of judgments15 — Suspension or cessation of operation of Act16 — Transitional matters for ENDNOTES northern territory of australia

northern territory of australia

As in force at 1 January 2022

Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) act 1987

An Act to make provision for the cross-vesting of certain jurisdiction

1Short title

This Act may be cited as the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987.

2Commencement

(1)
Sections 1 and 2 shall come into operation on the day on which the Administrator’s assent to this Act is declared.
(2)
The remaining provisions of this Act shall come into operation on a date to be fixed by the Administrator by notice in the Gazette.

3Interpretation

(1)
In this Act:
Full Court, in relation to a Supreme Court of a State, includes a court of the State to which appeals lie from a single judge of that Supreme Court.
judgment means a judgment, decree or order, whether final or interlocutory.
Northern Territory matter means a matter:
- (a)
  in which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction otherwise than by reason of a law of the Commonwealth or of another State; or
- (b)
  removed to the Supreme Court under section 8.
party, in relation to a proceeding, includes a person who intervenes in the proceeding.
proceeding does not include a criminal proceeding.
special federal matter has the same meaning as in the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 of the Commonwealth.
State means the Australian Capital Territory, the Northern Territory or a State of the Commonwealth.
State Family Court, in relation to a State, means a court of that State to which section 41 of the Family Law Act 1975 of the Commonwealth applied by virtue of a Proclamation made under section 41(2) of that Act.
Territory does not include the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory.
Note for subsection (1)
The Interpretation Act 1978 contains definitions and other provisions that may be relevant to this Act.
(2)
A reference in this Act, other than a reference in section 4(3), to the Supreme Court of a State includes, if there is a State Family Court of that State, a reference to that State Family Court.

3ACorporations Act of the Commonwealth

This Act does not apply to the jurisdiction of courts with which Division 1 of Part 9.6A of the Corporations Act 2001 of the Commonwealth deals.

4Vesting of additional jurisdiction in certain Courts

(1)
The Federal Court has and may exercise original and appellate jurisdiction in respect of Northern Territory matters.
(2)
The Family Court has and may exercise original and appellate jurisdiction in respect of Northern Territory matters.
(3)
The Supreme Court of another State or of a Territory has and may exercise original and appellate jurisdiction in respect of Northern Territory matters.
(4)
The State Family Court of another State has and may exercise original and appellate jurisdiction in respect of Northern Territory matters.
(5)
Subsection (1), (2), (3) or (4) does not:
- (a)
  invest the Federal Court, the Family Court or a Supreme Court with; or
- (b)
  confer on any such court,
jurisdiction in respect of criminal matters.

5Transfer of proceedings

(1)
Where:
- (a)
  a proceeding (in this subsection referred to as the relevant proceeding) is pending in the Supreme Court; and
- (b)
  it appears to the Supreme Court that:
  - (i)
    the relevant proceeding arises out of, or is related to, another proceeding pending in the Federal Court or the Family Court and it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Federal Court or the Family Court;
  - (ii)
    having regard to:
    (A) whether, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction and apart from an accrued jurisdiction of the Federal Court or the Family Court, the relevant proceeding or a substantial part of the relevant proceeding would have been incapable of being instituted in the Supreme Court and capable of being instituted in the Federal Court or the Family Court;
    (B) the extent to which, in the opinion of the Supreme Court, the matters for determination in the relevant proceeding are matters arising under or involving questions as to the application, interpretation or validity of a law of the Commonwealth and not within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction; and
    (C) the interests of justice,
  it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Federal Court or the Family Court, as the case may be; or
  - (iii)
    it is otherwise in the interests of justice that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Federal Court or the Family Court,
the Supreme Court shall transfer the relevant proceeding to the Federal Court or the Family Court, as the case may be.
(2)
Where:
- (a)
  a proceeding (in this subsection referred to as the relevant proceeding) is pending in the Supreme Court (in this subsection referred to as the first court); and
- (b)
  it appears to the first court that:
  - (i)
    the relevant proceeding arises out of, or is related to, another proceeding pending in the Supreme Court of another State or of a Territory and it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by that other Supreme Court;
  - (ii)
    having regard to:
    (A) whether, in the opinion of the first court, apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction, the relevant proceeding or a substantial part of the relevant proceeding would have been incapable of being instituted in the first court and capable of being instituted in the Supreme Court of another State or Territory;
    (B) the extent to which, in the opinion of the first court, the matters for determination in the relevant proceeding are matters arising under or involving questions as to the application, interpretation or validity of a law of that other State or Territory and not within the jurisdiction of the first court apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction; and
    (C) the interests of justice,
  it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by that other Supreme Court; or
  - (iii)
    it is otherwise in the interests of justice that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Supreme Court of another State or of a Territory,
the first court shall transfer the relevant proceeding to that other Supreme Court.
(3)
Where:
- (a)
  a proceeding (in this subsection referred to as the relevant proceeding) is pending in the Supreme Court of another State or of a Territory (in this subsection referred to as the first court); and
- (b)
  it appears to the first court that:
  - (i)
    the relevant proceeding arises out of, or is related to, another proceeding pending in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory and it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory;
  - (ii)
    having regard to:
    (A) whether, in the opinion of the first court, apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction, the relevant proceeding or a substantial part of the relevant proceeding would have been incapable of being instituted in the first court and capable of being instituted in the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory;
    (B) the extent to which, in the opinion of the first court, the matters for determination in the relevant proceeding are matters arising under or involving questions as to the application, interpretation or validity of a law of the State and not within the jurisdiction of the first court apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction; and
    (C) the interests of justice,
  it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory; or
  - (iii)
    it is otherwise in the interests of justice that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory,
the first court shall transfer the relevant proceeding to the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory.
(4)
Where:
- (a)
  a proceeding (in this subsection referred to as the relevant proceeding) is pending in the Federal Court or the Family Court (in this subsection referred to as the first court); and
- (b)
  it appears to the first court that:
  - (i)
    the relevant proceeding arises out of, or is related to, another proceeding pending in the Supreme Court and it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Supreme Court;
  - (ii)
    having regard to:
    (A) whether, in the opinion of the first court, apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction, the relevant proceeding or a substantial part of the relevant proceeding would have been incapable of being instituted in the first court and capable of being instituted in the Supreme Court;
    (B) the extent to which, in the opinion of the first court, the matters for determination in the relevant proceeding are matters arising under or involving questions as to the application, interpretation or validity of a law of the State and not within the jurisdiction of the first court apart from this Act and a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction; and
    (C) the interests of justice,
  it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the Supreme Court; or
  - (iii)
    it is otherwise in the interests of justice that the relevant proceeding be determined by that other court,
the first court shall transfer the relevant proceeding to the Supreme Court.
(5)
Where:
- (a)
  a proceeding (in this subsection referred to as the relevant proceeding) is pending in the Federal Court or the Family Court (in this subsection referred to as the first court); and
- (b)
  it appears to the first court that:
  - (i)
    the relevant proceeding arises out of, or is related to, another proceeding pending in the other of the courts referred to in paragraph (a) and it is more appropriate that the relevant proceeding be determined by the other of the courts referred to in paragraph (a); or
  - (ii)
    it is otherwise in the interests of justice that the relevant proceeding be determined by the other of the courts referred to in paragraph (a),
the first court shall transfer the relevant proceeding to that other court.
(6)
Where:
- (a)
  a court (in this subsection referred to as the first court) transfers a proceeding to another court under a law or laws relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction; and
- (b)
  it appears to the first court that:
  - (i)
    there is another proceeding pending in the first court that arises out of, or is related to, the first-mentioned proceeding; and
  - (ii)
    it is in the interests of justice that the other proceeding be determined by the other court,
the first court shall transfer the other proceeding to the other court.
(7)
A court may transfer a proceeding under this section on the application of a party to the proceeding, of its own motion or on the application of the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory.
(8)
A person who is entitled to practise as a barrister or solicitor, or as both a barrister and a solicitor, in a court has, if a proceeding (in this subsection referred to as the transferred proceeding) in that court is transferred to another court under a law or laws relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction, the same entitlement to practise in relation to:
- (a)
  the transferred proceeding; and
- (b)
  any other proceeding out of which the transferred proceeding arises or to which the transferred proceeding is related, being another proceeding that is to be determined together with the transferred proceeding,
in the other court that the person would have if the other court were a Federal court exercising Federal jurisdiction.

6Special federal matters

(1)
Where a matter for determination in a proceeding that is pending in the Supreme Court is a special federal matter, the Supreme Court, if it does not make an order under subsection (3) in respect of the matter, shall transfer the proceeding in accordance with this section to the Federal Court or a court mentioned in subsection (2)(b).
(2)
If the court orders that a proceeding be transferred, the proceeding shall be transferred:
- (a)
  if the matter for determination in the proceeding is a matter mentioned in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of the definition of special federal matter in section 3(1) of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 of the Commonwealth – to the Federal Court; or
- (b)
  if the matter for determination in the proceeding is a matter mentioned in paragraph (ab) of that definition – to whichever of the Family Court or the Family Court of Western Australia, in the opinion of the court, is appropriate in the circumstances.
(3)
The Supreme Court may order that the proceeding be determined by that court if it is satisfied that there are special reasons for doing so in the particular circumstances of the proceeding other than reasons relevant to the convenience of the parties.
(4)
Before making an order under subsection (3), the court must be satisfied that:
- (a)
  a written notice specifying the nature of the special federal matter has been given to the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth and the Attorney-General of the State; and
- (b)
  a reasonable time has elapsed since the giving of the notice for the Attorney-General to consider whether submissions to the court should be made in relation to the proceeding.
(5)
For the purposes of subsection (4), the court:
- (a)
  may adjourn the proceeding for such time as the court thinks necessary and may make such order as to costs in relation to an adjournment as it thinks fit; and
- (b)
  may direct a party to the proceeding to give a notice in accordance with that subsection.
(6)
In considering whether there are special reasons for the purposes of subsection (3), the court shall:
- (a)
  act on the general rule that special federal matters should be heard by the Federal Court or mentioned in subsection (2)(b), whichever is appropriate in the particular case; and
- (b)
  take into account any submission made in relation to the proceeding by an Attorney-General mentioned in subsection (4).
(7)
Nothing in this section prevents the court granting urgent relief of an interlocutory nature if it is in the interests of justice to do so.
(8)
Where, through inadvertence, the Supreme Court determines a proceeding of the kind mentioned in subsection (1) without:
- (a)
  the court making an order under subsection (3) that the proceeding be determined by the court; or
- (b)
  a notice mentioned in subsection (4) being given,
nothing in this section invalidates the decision of the court.
(9)
This section does not apply to a proceeding by way of an appeal that is instituted in the Full Court of the Supreme Court if the court the decision of which is the subject of the appeal had made an order under subsection (3), or under subsection (1) as in force before the commencement of the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Amendment Act 1992, in relation to the special federal matter.
(10)
Despite the substitution of this section by the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Amendment Act 1992, this section as in force immediately before the commencement of that Act continues to apply in relation to a proceeding pending in a court to which this section applied before that commencement.

7Institution and hearing of appeals

(1)
An appeal shall not be instituted from a decision of a single judge of the Federal Court or the Family Court to the Full Court of the Supreme Court.
(2)
An appeal shall not be instituted from the Federal Court or the Family Court to the other of those courts.
(3)
Where it appears that the only matters for determination in a proceeding by way of an appeal from a decision of a single judge of the Supreme Court are matters other than matters arising under an Act specified in the Schedule to the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 of the Commonwealth, that proceeding shall be instituted only in, and shall be determined only by, the Full Court of the Supreme Court.
(4)
Subject to subsections (6) and (7), where it appears that a matter for determination in a proceeding by way of an appeal from a decision of a single judge of the Supreme Court (not being a proceeding to which subsection (5) applies) is a matter arising under an Act specified in the Schedule referred to in subsection (3), that proceeding shall be instituted only in, and shall be determined only by:
- (a)
  the Full Court of the Federal Court or of the Family Court, as the case requires; or
- (b)
  with special leave of the High Court, the High Court.
(5)
A proceeding by way of an appeal from a decision of a judge of a State Family Court, being a proceeding involving the determination of:
- (a)
  a matter arising under an Act specified in the Schedule referred to in subsection (3); and
- (b)
  another matter:
may be dealt with as if no matter for determination in the proceeding were a matter arising under an Act specified in that Schedule.
(6)
Where:
- (a)
  the Full Court of the Supreme Court commences to hear a proceeding by way of an appeal; and
- (b)
  before the Court determines the proceeding, it appears to it that the proceeding is a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies,
it shall, unless the interests of justice require that it proceed to determine the proceeding, transfer the proceeding to the Full Court of the Federal Court or of the Family Court, as the case requires.
(7)
Where the Full Court of the Supreme Court:
- (a)
  determines a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies as mentioned in subsection (6); or
- (b)
  through inadvertence, determines a proceeding to which subsection (4) applies,
nothing in this section invalidates the decision of that Court.

8Orders by Supreme Court

(1)
Where:
- (a)
  a proceeding (in this subsection called the relevant proceeding) is pending in:
  - (i)
    a court, other than the Supreme Court, of the State; or
  - (ii)
    a tribunal established by or under an Act; and
- (b)
  it appears to the Supreme Court that:
  - (i)
    the relevant proceeding arises out of, or is related to, another proceeding pending in the Federal Court, the Family Court, the Supreme Court of another State or of a Territory or a State Family Court and, if an order is made under this subsection in relation to the relevant proceeding, there would be grounds on which the other proceeding could be transferred to the Supreme Court; or
  - (iii)
    an order should be made under this subsection in relation to the relevant proceeding so that consideration can be given to whether the relevant proceeding should be transferred to another court,
the Supreme Court may, on the application of a party to the relevant proceeding or of its own motion, make an order removing the relevant proceeding to the Supreme Court.
(2)
Where an order is made under subsection (1) in relation to a proceeding, this Act applies in relation to the proceeding as if it were a proceeding pending in the Supreme Court.
(3)
Where a proceeding is removed to the Supreme Court in accordance with an order made under subsection (1), the Supreme Court may, if it considers it appropriate to do so, remit the proceeding to the court or tribunal from which the proceeding was removed.

9Exercise of jurisdiction pursuant to cross-vesting laws

The Supreme Court may:

(a)
exercise jurisdiction (whether original or appellate) conferred on that Court by this Act or a law of the Commonwealth or a State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction; and
(b)
hear and determine a proceeding transferred to that Court under this Act or such a law.

10Transfer of matters arising under certain provisions of the Australian Consumer Law applying as a law of the Commonwealth

(1)
This section applies if:
- (a)
  a proceeding is pending in the Federal Court, Family Court, Supreme Court or Supreme Court of another State or a Territory; and
(b) a matter for determination in the proceeding is a matter arising under any of the following provisions of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), applying as a law of the Commonwealth:
- (i)
  Part 3-1, Divisions 1, 2, 4 or 5;
- (ii)
  Part 3-3;
- (iii)
  Part 3-4; and
(c) no matter for determination in the proceeding is a special federal matter; and
(d) the proceeding is not a proceeding by way of an appeal from a judgment of a court; and
(e) a court of the State, other than the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction in respect of all matters for determination in the proceeding.
(2)
The court mentioned in subsection (1)(a) may, on the application of a party to the proceeding or of its own motion, transfer the proceeding to the court mentioned in subsection (1)(e).

11Conduct of proceedings

(1)
Where it appears to a court that the court will, or will be likely to, in determining a matter for determination in a proceeding, be exercising jurisdiction invested or conferred by this Act or by a law of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction:
- (a)
  subject to paragraphs (b) and (c), the court shall, in determining that matter, apply the law in force in the State or Territory in which the court is sitting (including choice of law rules);
- (b)
  subject to paragraph (c), if that matter is a right of action arising under a written law of another State or of a Territory, the court shall, in determining that matter, apply the written and unwritten law of that other State or of that Territory; and
- (c)
  the rules of evidence and procedure to be applied in dealing with that matter shall be such as the court considers appropriate in the circumstances, being rules that are applied in a superior court in Australia or in an external Territory of Australia.
(2)
The reference in subsection (1)(a) to the State or Territory in which the court is sitting is, in relation to the Federal Court or the Family Court, a reference to the State or Territory in which any matter for determination in the proceeding was first commenced in or transferred to that court.
(3)
Where a proceeding is transferred or removed to a court (in this subsection referred to as the transferee court) from another court (in this subsection referred to as the transferor court), the transferee court shall deal with the proceeding as if, subject to any order of the transferee court, the steps that had been taken for the purposes of the proceeding in the transferor court (including the making of an order), or similar steps, had been taken in the transferee court.

12Orders as to costs

Where a proceeding is transferred or removed to a court, that court may make an order as to costs that relate to the conduct of the proceeding before the transfer or removal if those costs have not already been dealt with by another court.

13Limitation on appeals

An appeal does not lie from a decision of a court:

(a)
in relation to the transfer or removal of a proceeding under this Act; or
(b)
as to which rules of evidence and procedure are to be applied pursuant to section 11(1).

14Enforcement and effect of judgments

(1)
A judgment of the Federal Court or the Family Court that is given, in whole or in part, in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by a law or laws relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction is enforceable in the Northern Territory as if the judgment had been given entirely in the exercise of the jurisdiction of that court apart from any such law.
(2)
A judgment of the Supreme Court that is given, in whole or in part, in the exercise of jurisdiction conferred by a law or laws relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction is enforceable in the Northern Territory as if the judgment had been given entirely in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court apart from any such law.
(3)
Where:
- (a)
  a provision of a law of the Northern Territory (not being a law relating to the enforcement of judgments) refers to a thing done by the Supreme Court; and
- (b)
  that thing is done by another court in exercise of jurisdiction conferred by this Act,
the reference in that provision to the Supreme Court shall be read as a reference to that other court.

15Suspension or cessation of operation of Act

(1)
Subject to subsection (2), the Administrator may, if a notice has not been published under subsection (4), by notice in the Gazette, declare that the operation of this Act is suspended from a day (being a day not earlier than 3 years after the commencement of this Act) specified in the notice and, where such a notice is published this Act ceases to be in force from that day until a notice is published under subsection (3) revoking the first-mentioned notice.
(2)
The Administrator shall not make a notice under subsection (1) having effect from a particular day unless satisfied that the Attorney-General has given notice of his or her intention to seek the making of such a notice to the Commonwealth and to each other State (other than a State in relation to which a notice under subsection (5) has been made) not earlier than 6 months before that day.
(3)
Where the Administrator has made a notice under subsection (1), he may, by notice in the Gazette, revoke the first-mentioned notice.
(4)
Where the Administrator is satisfied that the Acts of the Commonwealth and other States relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction are not effective to invest the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory with, or confer on that Court, jurisdiction of the Federal Court, the Family Court or a Supreme Court of another State or of a Territory, the Administrator may, by notice in the Gazette, declare that this Act shall, on a day specified in the notice, cease to be in force and, where such a notice is published, this Act ceases to be in force on that day.
(5)
Where the Administrator is satisfied that an Act of the Commonwealth or another State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction has been repealed, rendered inoperative, suspended or altered in a substantial manner, the Administrator may, by notice in the Gazette, declare that this Act shall, on a day specified in the notice, cease to be in force in relation to the Commonwealth or a Territory or in relation to that State and, where such a notice is published, this Act ceases to be in force in relation to the Commonwealth or a Territory or that State on that day.
(6)
Where:
- (a)
  the Administrator has published a notice under subsection (5) in relation to the Commonwealth or a Territory or a State; and
- (b)
  is satisfied that there is in force an Act of the Commonwealth or that State relating to cross-vesting of jurisdiction, being an Act in terms substantially corresponding to the terms of this Act,
the Administrator may, by notice in the Gazette, declare that this Act again applies in relation to the Commonwealth or the Territory or that State from a day specified in the notice and, where such a notice is published, this Act applies in relation to the Commonwealth or Territory or that State on and after that day.
(7)
Where by virtue of this section this Act ceases to be in force either generally or in relation to the Commonwealth, a Territory or a State, section 12 of the Interpretation Act 1978 applies to the extent of that cessation as if that cessation were a repeal of this Act.

16Transitional matters for

(1)
This section applies if, on or after the commencement of this section:
- (a)
  a proceeding is pending in the Federal Court, Family Court, Supreme Court or Supreme Court of another State or a Territory; and
(b) a matter for determination in the proceeding is a matter arising under Part V, Division 1 or 1A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); and
(c) no matter for determination in the proceeding is a special federal matter; and
(d) the proceeding is not a proceeding by way of an appeal from a judgment of a court; and
(e) a court of the State, other than the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction in respect of all matters for determination in the proceeding.
(2)
The court mentioned in subsection (1)(a) may, on the application of a party to the proceeding or of its own motion, transfer the proceeding to the court mentioned in subsection (1)(e).

ENDNOTES

1
KEY

Key to abbreviations

amd = amended od = order

app = appendix om = omitted

bl = by-law pt = Part

ch = Chapter r = regulation/rule

cl = clause rem = remainder

div = Division renum = renumbered

exp = expires/expired rep = repealed

f = forms s = section

Gaz = Gazette sch = Schedule

hdg = heading sdiv = Subdivision

ins = inserted SL = Subordinate Legislation

lt = long title sub = substituted

nc = not commenced

2
LIST OF LEGISLATION

Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (Act No. 41, 1987)
Assent date	15 October 1987
Commenced	1 July 1988 (Gaz S32, 1 July 1988)
Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Amendment Act 1992 (Act No. 70, 1992)
Assent date	14 December 1992
Commenced	1 March 1993 (Gaz S19, 26 February 1993)
Statute LawRevision Act 1994 (Act No. 50, 1994)
Assent date	20 September 1994
Commenced	20 September 1994
Corporations Reform (Consequential Amendments NT) Act 2001 (Act No. 17, 2001)
Assent date	29 June 2001
Commenced	15 July 2001 (s 2, s 2 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth Act No. 50, 2001) and Cth Gaz S285, 13 July 2001)
Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading Amendment (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2010 (Act No. 41, 2010)
Assent date	8 December 2010
Commenced	1 January 2011 (Gaz S71, 20 December 2010)
Justice and Other Legislation Amendment (Australian Crime Commission) Act 2017 (Act No. 9, 2017)
Assent date	31 May 2017
Commenced	31 May 2017
Interpretation Amendment Act 2021 (Act No. 28, 2021)
Assent date	15 December 2021
Commenced	1 January 2022 (s 2)

3
GENERAL AMENDMENTS

General amendments of a formal nature (which are not referred to in the table of amendments to this reprint) are made by the Interpretation Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (Act No. 22, 2018) to: ss 1, 3 and 15.

4
LIST OF AMENDMENTS

s 3 amd No. 50, 1994, s 16; No. 9, 2017, s 9; No. 28, 2021, s 20

s 3A ins No. 17, 2001, s 10

s 6 sub No. 70, 1992, s 3

s 10 sub No. 41, 2010, s 28

s 16 ins No. 41, 2010, s 28

Actions

Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Citations

Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NT)

Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0